范文澜《文心雕龙讲疏》发覆

Revealing of Fan Wenlan’s Teaching Material of The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons

对于《文心雕龙》研究者来说,范文澜的《文心雕龙注》无疑是必读之书,但范氏早年之作《文心雕龙讲疏》却鲜为人知。而所以如此,根源乃在范氏讲疏大量抄录黄侃《文心雕龙札记》,致使黄、范二人失和。此后范氏另起炉灶,完成《文心雕龙注》一书的写作,而绝口不提此书与《文心雕龙讲疏》之关系;黄侃则悄然中断了《文心雕龙札记》的写作,且终其一生不再讲授《文心雕龙》。事实上,范氏与黄侃虽有师生之谊,却不是黄侃入门弟子,难称"黄门侍郎";而范文澜《文心雕龙讲疏》抄录黄侃《文心雕龙札记》处固多有说明,然直接袭用或稍加变化以为己意者亦不在少数。揭橥这段往事,不仅有助于更好地认识黄、范二人及相关著述之真实关系,而且可为《文心雕龙》之现代研究提供新的理解。

Fan Wenlans Commentaries on the Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons should be a must reading material for researchers ofThe Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons,but Fan Wenlan’s early yearswriting,Teaching Material of the Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragonswas rarely known by people.The reason for this was that he copied a large number of Huang Kan’s notes on The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons,which caused the discord between Huang Kan and Fan Wenlan.After that,FanWenlan made a new start and accomplished his writing of the bookCommentaries on The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons,but never mentioned the relation between this book and the previousTeaching Materialever since.At the same time,Huang Kan stopped writing theReading Notesquietly and nevertaughtThe Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragonsin the rest of his career.As a matter of fact,Fan Wenlan could not be viewed as the senior student of Huang Kan as Fan Wenlan was not Huang Kan’sdisciple,though their relationship was like teacher and student.While there existed quite a few of direct citing to be considered as his own opinion modified from Huang Kan’s Reading Notes,even it had a fewstatements.To reveal these past things could both help to find the true relations between Huang Kan and FanWenlan and their writings and to have a better understanding of modern research onThe Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons.