程序阻却还是纠纷解决——执行和解功能上的批判与反思

Procedure Preventing or Dispute Resolving:Criticism and Reflection on the Function of Executive Reconciliation

执行和解在“基本解决执行难”方面发挥着重要的作用,但由于社会生活的复杂性,实践中执行和解的纠纷解决功能还没有充分发挥出来,甚至在程序运作中出现功能错位的现象。从规范和实践层面考察,执行和解更多地发挥了程序阻却功能,而不是纠纷解决功能。这与执行和解的性质有关,而学界关于执行和解的性质尚未形成共识,不同的观点赋予执行和解不同的功能,而不论在理论还是实践中,执行和解的功能定位为纠纷解决都具有一定的合理性。随着执行和解制度规范的完善,应当站在“解释+构建”的法教义学立场推进执行和解纠纷解决功能的实现。

The executive reconciliation plays an important role in“seeking a basic solution to executive difficul⁃ty”,however,due to the complexity of social life,the dispute resolution function of executive reconciliation in prac⁃tice has not been fully exerted,and even the phenomenon of functional misplacement happened in the operation of the procedure.From the perspective of norms and practices,the executive reconciliation has played the role in proce⁃dure preventing,rather than dispute resolving.Which is related to the nature of the executive reconciliation,but the academic community has not yet reached a consensus on it,different views enduing different functions to the execu⁃tive reconciliation.The function of executive reconciliation is reasonable for dispute resolution from the perspective both theory and practice.With the improvement of the executive reconciliation system,we should promote the dis⁃pute resolution function from the legal dogmatic perspective of“interpretation+construction”.