摘要
美国人类学家埃里克·缪格勒的《野鬼时代》以云南永仁县直苴彝族倮倮颇人的“ȵi21”信仰为核心的各类鬼故事和相关祭祀仪式为研究对象,对当地民众有关20世纪50年代至90年代诸多历史事件的记忆进行了形象生动的解读,产生了较大的学术影响。“ȵi21”是该论著的核心概念,对“ȵi21”的理解是否正确成为阐释当地社会文化的关键。“ȵi21”在彝族语言中是“鬼”“神”“精”“怪”等的统称。然而,缪格勒对“ȵi21”的解读(客位)与当地倮倮颇人的解读(主位)存在较大偏差,既缺乏对主位理解的充分尊重,也缺失多元主体发声。缪格勒未能克服语言阻碍,导致其对“ȵi21”的理解产生诸多错误。
The Age of Wild Ghosts(Erik Mueggler)focuses on the various ghost stories and related sacrificial rites centered on the belief of“ȵi21”of Luoluopo people,a branch of YI ethnic minority in Yongren County,Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture,Yunnan Province.It vividly interprets the local people’s historical memories of many historical events from 1950s to 1990s,and also has a great academic impact.Since“ȵi21”is the core concept in Mueggler’s book,the understanding of“ȵi21”becomes crucial for interpretation of local social culture.In YI language,“ȵi21”is an umbrella name of“ghost”,“God”,“essence”and“monster”.However,differences between interpretations of“ȵi21”from Mugler(Etic)and from local people(Emic)are obvious.The Age of Wild Ghosts not only lacks full respect for emic understanding,but also lacks voice from multiple subjects.The language barrier triggers Mugler’s misunderstanding of“ȵi21”.The thesis tries to point out all mistakes of The Age of Wild Ghosts and fulill a restudy of Zhiju village from perspectives of emic and etic.
作者
普富香
马翀炜
PU Fu-xiang;MA Chong-wei(Southwest Frontier Minority Research Center,Yunnan University,Kunming 650091,China)
出处
《北方民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第4期85-94,共10页
Journal of North Minzu University(Philosophy and Social Science)
基金
云南大学民族学一流学科建设项目“云南彝族鬼神信仰研究:反思缪格勒《野鬼时代——中国西南的记忆、暴力和空间》”(2017SYl0023)。