期刊文献+

输尿管结石并发尿脓毒血症的预测与治疗研究 被引量:4

Prediction and treatment of ureteral calculi complicated with urinary sepsis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评估输尿管结石合并泌尿系感染疾病进展的危险因素;评估尿脓毒血症的预警因子的意义;对比各种治疗方案的效果。方法选取北京市仁和医院2014年1月至2018年5月诊治的73例输尿管结石合并泌尿系感染患者作为研究对象。其中明确诊断尿脓毒血症患者21例为研究组,经单纯抗感染未进展的患者52例为对照组。研究组中有10例为治疗过程中进展为尿脓毒血症患者,将该10例患者称为进展组。分别比较其治疗前后血清降钙素原(PCT),C反应蛋白(CRP)水平,比较其预警效果;观察三组患者细菌培养阳性率区别;比较各组患者结石大小及合并糖尿病比例。结果全部患者中,女性患者比例较高(84.9%),但尿脓毒血症的发病率(29.0%)与男性(27.3%)比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.09)。研究组和进展组的尿细菌培养阳性率与对照组均无差别,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。疾病不同程度进展与结石的大小差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。但研究组和进展组中糖尿病患者比例明显高于对照组患者,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。治疗前研究组和进展组的PCT水平明显高于对照组,研究组中CRP水平明显高于对照组患者,差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.01),但进展组中CRP水平与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,各观察组PCT与CRP水平与对照组比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。经过积极抗感染治疗或同时于早期联合手术解除梗阻治疗后,所有病例均治愈,无严重并发症或死亡发生。结论PCT可作为输尿管结石合并泌尿系感染早期诊断的重要指标广泛应用,应用最微创的手段早期解除梗阻是治疗的关键。 Objective To evaluate the deteriorating risk factors of urinary tract infection complicated with ureteral calculi,evaluate the significance of urine sepsis warning factors,and compare the effects of various therapeutic regimen.Methods 73 patients with urinary tract infections complicated with ureteral calculi in Beijing Renhe Hospital between January 2014 and May 2018 were selected,including 21 patients with sepsis as the observation group and 52 cases who did not progress after anti-infection treatment as control group.10 patients deteriorated to sepsis after anti-infection treatment in observation group were called as progress group.The Procalcitonin(PCT)and C-reactive protein(CRP)levels before and after the treatment were compared,and their early warning effect was compared.The difference in positive rate of germiculture between each groups was observed and the calculous size and proportion of diabetes mellitus in patients between groups was compared.Results Female made up a high percentage(84.9%)in all the patients.The incidence rate of urinary sepsis was 29.0%in female and 27.3%in male,with no statistically significant differences(P=0.09).There were no statistically significant differences in the urine bacteria culture positive rate between the observation group/progress group and the control group(all P>0.05).The progress of the disease had no obvious relation with the size of stones(P>0.05).The proportions of patients with diabetes in the observation group and progress group were obviously higher than that of control group(P<0.01).Before treatment,the PCT level of observation group and progress group was obviously higher than that of control group and the CRP levels of observation group were significantly higher than those in control group,all with statistically significant differences(all P<0.01),but no statistically significant difference in the CRP levels was found between the progress group and the control group(P>0.05).After treatment,there were no statistically significant differences in both PCT and CRP level between observation/progress group and the control group(all P>0.05).All cases were cured,and there were no serious complications or death occurred,after active anti-infection treatment or at the same time removing obstruction by surgical method in the early time.Conclusions PCT can be widely used as an important index in the early diagnosis of ureteral calculi complicated with urinary tract infection.It is the key to treat the early obstruction by using the most minimal invasive method.
作者 李想 LI Xiang(Department of Urology,Beijing Renhe Hospital,Beijing 102600,China)
出处 《中国性科学》 2020年第7期15-18,共4页 Chinese Journal of Human Sexuality
关键词 输尿管结石 尿脓毒血症 降钙素原 输尿管支架置入术 Ureteral calculi Urine sepsis Procalcitonin Ureteral stenting
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献173

  • 1胡云建,俞云松,张秀珍,陈东科.产超广谱β-内酰胺酶细菌的分子流行病学研究[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2004,14(3):241-244. 被引量:33
  • 2高旭,许传亮,陈策,高小峰,王林辉,孙颖浩.输尿管镜下钬激光碎石术后重症感染诊治体会(附专家点评)[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(1):33-35. 被引量:209
  • 3张卫东,陈健,唐张峰,廖国强,彭炎.钬激光腔内碎石术治疗输尿管、膀胱结石[J].中国微创外科杂志,2006,6(5):374-376. 被引量:14
  • 4王少刚,席启林,叶章群,刘继红,张旭,庄乾元,杨为民,陈志强,杜广辉,陈忠,胡志全,郭小林,宋晓东,余烧.腔内钬激光治疗输尿管息肉101例报告[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2007,28(8):526-528. 被引量:42
  • 5韩先知,吴开攸主编.体外冲击波碎石技术[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004,10:123-124.
  • 6那彦群.实用泌尿外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:145-147.
  • 7叶章群.尿石症诊断治疗指南[M]//那彦群,叶章群,孙光.中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:209-241.
  • 8Verze P, Imbimbo C, Cancelmo G, et al. Extracorpo- real shockwave lithotripsy VS ureteroscopy as first-line therapy for patients with single, distal ureteric stones: a prospective randomized study[J]. BJU Int, 2010, 106(11) : 1748-1752.
  • 9Shoh O D, Matlaga B R, Assimos D G, et al. Selecting treatment for distal ureteral calculi: shock wave litho- tripsy versus ureteroscopy~J]. Rev Urol, 2003, 5(1) : 40-44.
  • 10Singh I, Gupta N P, Hemal A K, et al. Impact of power index, hydroureteronephrosis, stone size, and composition on the efficacy of in situ boosted ESWL for primary proximal ureteral calculi~J]. Urology, 2001, 58(1) : 16-22.

共引文献255

同被引文献37

引证文献4

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部