基于中外文献分析的口腔医学教育热点对比研究

Comparative Study on Hotspots of Stomatology Education Based on Chinese and Foreign Literature Analysis

目的:通过对CNKI及PubMed数据库中主题或主题词为“口腔医学教育”的文献分别进行共词聚类分析。分析中外文献对口腔医学教育热点的异同。方法:运用Bicomb2软件和gCLUTO1.0软件对CNKI和PubMed中口腔医学教育主题相关文献进行热点分析。结果:(1)中文文献被聚为7类,外文文献被聚为12类。中外文献的研究热点有明显差异。(2)中文文献在20世纪90年代逐渐增多,而外文文献则在60年代中期出现激增。结论:本研究发现有关口腔医学教育中文文献关注点较为抽象,评价、评估及描述教育现状的主题较多,以培养更专业、实践性更强的口腔医生为最终目的。外文文献则着力于口腔医学教学与社会群体性事件相结合,以及口腔医疗中具体问题在教学中的关注。

Objective:To analyze the similarities and differences between Chinese and foreign literatures on the hotspots of stomatology education.Methods:Bicomb 2 software and gCLUTO 1.0 software were used to analyze the hot topics in the literature of stomatology education in CNKI and PubMed.Results:Chinese literature was grouped into 7 categories and foreign literature into 12 categories.There were obvious differences in the research hotspots between Chinese and foreign literatures.Chinese literature gradually increased in the 1990s,while foreign literature surged in the mid-1960s.Conclusion:It is found that the focus of Chinese literature on stomatology education is abstract,and more attention is paid to the evaluation,evaluation and description of the current situation,with the ultimate goal of training more professional and more practical stomatologists.Foreign literature focuses on the combination of oral medicine teaching and social group events,as well as the attention to specific problems in oral medicine teaching.