期刊文献+

使用全面型防护面罩(带正压)与一次性使用头罩(非正压)对新型冠状病毒肺炎重症患者行气管插管的影响 被引量:5

Effects of using all⁃round protective mask(positive pressure)or disposable hood(non⁃positive pressure)on tracheal intuba⁃tion in patients with severe COVID⁃19
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨麻醉医师使用全面型防护面罩(带正压)与一次性使用头罩(非正压)对新型冠状病毒肺炎重症患者行气管插管的影响。方法回顾性纳入2020年2月16日至2月29日武汉市第一医院20例新型冠状病毒肺炎患者行气管插管的相关资料,其中9例气管插管时麻醉医师穿戴全面型防护面罩(带正压)设为面罩带正压组,11例气管插管时麻醉医师穿戴一次性使用头罩(非正压)设为头罩非正压组,收集2组气管插管所耗时长及麻醉医师进行气管插管时的焦虑评分、插管满意度、面屏是否起雾、是否有明显憋闷感等情况。结果面罩带正压组麻醉医师进行气管插管时的焦虑评分明显低于头罩非正压组(P<0.05),两组行气管插管所耗时长、插管满意度、面屏起雾以及明显憋闷感等方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论全面型防护面罩(带正压)与一次性使用头罩(非正压)比较,在一定程度上能使麻醉医师减轻焦虑感,二者在气管插管所耗时长以及插管满意度上能达到相同的效果,二者在短时间内(小于30 min)佩戴均不会出现面屏起雾和明显憋闷感。 Objective To discuss the effects of using all‑round protective mask(positive pressure)or disposable hood(non‑positive pressure)on tracheal intubation in patients with severe COVID‑19.Methods Twenty COVID‑19 patients who underwent endotracheal intubation from February 16 to February 29,2020 were retrospectively enrolled,including an all‑round protective mask(positive pressure)group with 9 anesthesiologists wearing all‑round protective mask(positive pressure)and a disposable hood(non‑positive pressure)group with 11 anesthesiologists wearing disposable hood(non‑positive pressure).Then,the following data were collected:the time‑consuming of tracheal intubation,anxiety score during tracheal intubation,endotracheal intubation satisfaction,the presence of screen fogging and obvious suffocation.Results Anesthesiologists in the all‑round protective mask(positive pressure)group presented remarkably lower anxiety scores of tracheal intubation than those in the disposable hood(non‑positive pressure)group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in intubation time‑consuming,satisfaction,screen fogging and obvious feeling of suffocation between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusions Compared to disposable hood(non‑positive pressure),all‑round protective mask(positive pressure)can relieve the anxiety of anesthesiologists to some extent.Both of them can achieve the same effects on the time‑consuming and satisfaction of endotracheal intubation.Within a short period of time(less than 30 min),no screen fogging and obvious feeling of suffocation appear in the two groups.
作者 徐林 戚忠 王加芳 李进 陈治军 Xu Lin;Qi Zhong;Wang Jiafang;Li Jin;Chen Zhijun(Department of Anesthesiology,Wuhan NO.1 Hospital,Wuhan 430030,China)
出处 《国际麻醉学与复苏杂志》 CAS 2020年第6期589-593,共5页 International Journal of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation
关键词 新型冠状病毒肺炎 全面型防护面罩(带正压) 气管插管 COVID‑19 All‑round protective mask(positive pressure) Tracheal intubation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献28

  • 1广东省防治非典型肺炎科技攻关专题组,徐远达,何为群,陈思蓓,肖正伦,黎毅敏,刘晓青,钟南山.11例重症严重急性呼吸综合征患者气管插管抢救的临床分析[J].广东医学,2003,24(z1):77-78. 被引量:4
  • 2王金静,吴宪宏,王家和,刘子军,张之翠,赵佳平,潘楚雄,李铭,石军.严重急性呼吸综合症气管插管41例的体会[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2004,24(6):474-475. 被引量:11
  • 3龚志毅,黄宇光,王静捷,徐庆,李勇,虞雪融,陈广俊,罗爱伦,任洪智.重症SARS患者的气管插管分析[J].中国医学科学院学报,2003,25(5):550-552. 被引量:6
  • 4裴立英,高占成,杨震,魏东光,王世鑫,吉健民,姜保国.医务人员感染严重急性呼吸综合征影响因素的调查研究(英文)[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2006,38(3):271-275. 被引量:9
  • 5.SAPS治疗学研究[N].中国医学论坛报.http://www.cmt.com.cn,2003-07-01.
  • 6Bernd SK Christian H.SARS的临床表现和诊断.http://www.cmt.com.cn/article/030522/a0305221801.htm,2003-05-22.
  • 7[1]Peiris JSM,Lai ST,Poon LLM,et al.Coronavirus as a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome.Lancet,2003,361:9366
  • 8[3]Hudson LD,Milberg JA,Anarid D,et al.Clinical risks for development of the acute respiratory distress syndrome.Am J Respir Crit Med,1995,138:720
  • 9Drosten C, Gather S, Preiser W, et al. Identifleation of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome[J].N Engl J Med,2003,348 : 1967-1976.
  • 10Donnelly CA, Ghani AC, Leung GI, et al. Epidemiological determinants of spread of causal agent of severe acute respirator ysyndrome in Hong Kong[J]. Lancet,2003,361 (9371) : 1761-1766.

共引文献112

同被引文献68

引证文献5

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部