期刊文献+

消费者环境意识及碳价约束下供应链减排的转移机制及决策 被引量:1

Transfer Mechanism and Decision of Supply Chain Emissions Reduction Under Consumer Environmental Awareness and Carbon Price Constraint
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对在碳价和消费者环境意识约束下由一个制造商和一个零售商组成的供应链系统,建立三阶段Stackelberg博弈模型分析供应链集中决策和分散决策下制造商和零售商的决策过程,并对集中决策和分散决策下的减排效果、消费者剩余、制造商转移减排任务系数进行比较分析.通过改变参数值和成本函数进行数值仿真和敏感性分析,检验模型的合理性和鲁棒性.研究发现,分散决策下,制造商是否转移减排任务取决于碳价和消费者环境意识约束,如果制造商转移减排任务,零售商收益、消费者需求和消费者剩余降低;分散决策和集中决策下减排效果不变,但集中决策下消费者需求和消费者剩余较高;集中决策下,制造商同时考虑减排成本和价格策略,消费者剩余增加. For the supply chain system which is consisted of one manufacturer and one retailer under the constraint of carbon price and consumer environmental awareness,we establish a three stage Stackelberg game model to analyse the decision of manufacturer and retailer under the decentralized decision and centralized decision,and investigate the effect of emission reduction,consumer welfare and Transfer emission reduction task coefficient.Besides,we use computational experiments to analyze the sensitivity by changing the parameter values and cost function,and examine the The rationality and robustness of the model.The results show that whether manufacturers transfer emission reduction tasks depends on carbon price and consumer environmental awareness constraints under the decentralized decision.If manufacturers transfer emission reduction tasks,retailers’revenue,consumer demand and consumer surplus are reduced.The effect of emission reduction is not changed under decentralized decision and centralized decision,but consumer demand and consumer welfare is relatively high under centralized decision.Under centralized decision,manufacturers consider both abatement cost and price strategy,and consumer surplus increases.
作者 刘云龙 苑媛 黄承锋 LIU Yun-long;YUAN Yuan;HUANG Cheng-feng(School of Economics and Management,Chongqing Jiaotong University,Chongqing 400074,China)
出处 《数学的实践与认识》 北大核心 2020年第12期67-78,共12页 Mathematics in Practice and Theory
关键词 碳排放 供应链 限额与交易 碳价 消费者环境意识 carbon emission supply chain cap-and-trade carbon price consumer environmental consciousness
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献35

  • 1European Commission. Europeans' attitudes towards the issue of sustainable consumption and production[M/OL]. [2012-11-08]. http://www.ec.europa.eu.
  • 2Chitra K. In search of the green consumers: A perceptual study[J]. Journal of Services Research, 2007, 7(1): 173-191.
  • 3Monica B, Frabcesco G. Electricity pricing under carbon emissions trading: A dominant firm with competitive fringe model[J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(8): 4200-4220.
  • 4Kara N, Syri S. The impacts of EU CO2 emissions trading on electricity markets and electricity consumers in Finland[J]. Energy Economics, 2008, 30(2): 193-211.
  • 5Kunt E. Incentives and prices in an emissions trading scheme with updating[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2008, 56(1): 69-82.
  • 6Atasu A, Sarvary M. Efficient take-back legislation[J]. Production and Operation Management, 2009, 18(3): 243-258.
  • 7Subramanian R, Gupta S, Talbot B. Compliance strategies under permits for emissions[J]. Production and Operation Management, 2007, 16(6): 763-779.
  • 8Rong A, Lahdelma R. CO2 emissions trading planning in combined heat and power production via multi-period stochastic optimization[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 176(3): 1874-1895.
  • 9Harris I, Naim M, Palmer A, et al. Assessing the impact of cost optimization based on infrastructure modeling on CO2 emissions[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2011, 131(1): 313-321.
  • 10Hua G, Cheng T, Wang S. Managing carbon footprints in inventory management[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2011, 132(1): 175-185.

共引文献160

同被引文献7

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部