期刊文献+

基于改进Murphy规则的锅炉智能融合故障诊断方法 被引量:3

Intelligent fusion fault diagnosis method for boiler based on improved Murphy rule
下载PDF
导出
摘要 锅炉故障是火力发电厂的一个重要问题,它具有高温高压高耦合性的特点。针对这一问题,提出一种基于改进Murphy规则的智能融合故障诊断方法。首先利用Relief算法对锅炉的各个变量进行特征提取与选择,获得11个模型输入变量;然后利用SVM、LVQ、PNN、BP 4种不同的分类器进行故障模型训练,并对每个模型进行性能评估;最后利用改进Murphy规则对4个分类器的结果进行融合,得到最终的故障诊断结果。运行结果证实该智能融合故障诊断方法可以有效诊断出锅炉故障,提高故障诊断的准确率,有效降低故障诊断的误报率与漏报率。 Boiler failure is an important problem in thermal power plant,which has the characteristics of high temperature,high pressure and high coupling.To solve this problem,an intelligent fusion fault diagnosis method based on improved Murphy rules is proposed.Firstly,the Releif algorithm is used to select the features of each variable of the boiler,and 11 model input variables are obtained.Then four different classifiers,SVM,LVQ,PNN and BP,are used to train fault models,and the performance of each model is evaluated.Finally,the improved Murphy rule is used to fuse the results of the four classifiers to get the final fault diagnosis results.The operation results show that the intelligent fusion fault diagnosis method can effectively diagnose the boiler fault,improve the accuracy of fault diagnosis,and effectively reduce the false alarm rate and missing alarm rate of fault diagnosis.
作者 梁涛 程立钦 姜文 王剑峰 LIANG Tao;CHENG Liqin;JIANG Wen;WANG Jianfeng(College of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science,Hebei University of Technology,Tianjin 300131,China;Hebei Jointo Energy Investment Co.,Ltd.,Shijiazhuang 050011,China)
出处 《中国测试》 CAS 北大核心 2020年第7期133-140,共8页 China Measurement & Test
基金 河北省科技支撑计划资助项目(17214304D,19210108D)。
关键词 火力发电 故障诊断 Murphy规则 结果融合 thermal power fault diagnosis Murphy rules result fusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献52

  • 1董明,严璋,杨莉,M.D.Judd.基于证据推理的电力变压器故障诊断策略(英文)[J].中国电机工程学报,2006,26(1):106-114. 被引量:37
  • 2王永强,律方成,李和明.基于粗糙集理论和贝叶斯网络的电力变压器故障诊断方法[J].中国电机工程学报,2006,26(8):137-141. 被引量:97
  • 3杨亚军,王福明.基于D-S的小波神经网络信息融合方法[J].弹箭与制导学报,2006,26(4):266-268. 被引量:4
  • 4惠增宏.基于加权D-S证据理论的分布式多传感器目标识别[J].计算机应用,2007,27(1):56-57. 被引量:14
  • 5YAGER R R. Comparing approximate reasoning and probabilistic reasoning using the Dempster-Shafer framework[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2009, 50(5) : 812-821.
  • 6HAENNI R. Are alternatives to Dempster's rule of combination real alternative?: Comments on "About the belief function combination and the conflict management problem" Lefever et al[J]. Information Fusion, 2002, 3 (3): 237-239.
  • 7MURPHY C K. Combining belief functions when evidence confliets[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2000, 29(1) : 1-9.
  • 8DENG Yong, SHI Wen-kang, ZHU Zhen-fu, et al. Combining belief functions based on distance of evidence[J] Decision Support Systems, 2004, 38(3): 489-493.
  • 9JOUSSELME A L, LIU Chun-sheng, GRENIER D, et Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: al. Measuring ambiguity in the evidence theory[J]. IEEE Systems and Humans, 2006,36(5):890-903.
  • 10LIU Wei-ru. Analyzing the degree of conflict among belief functions[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 2006,170(11): 909-924.

共引文献78

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部