摘要
针对现有卷烟感官品质评价方式的评价结果差异不明显和变化趋势不明确的问题,建立了一种新的烟草感官品质对比评价方法:采用专家咨询法并结合实际评吸经验,根据消费者的关注程度对优雅度、满足感、舒适感和轻松感各感官品质评价指标赋予权重,利用数理统计方法对各评吸人员的评价结果进行计算,得出卷烟各感官品质评价指标小项和总体得分,并根据各项得分判定实验样品间感官品质差异程度和变化方向.可行性验证结果表明:该方法即使在感官品质变化较小时,也能够较好地从分值上进行区分;其既能反映整体感官品质的差异程度,又能反映总体或单个感官品质评价指标的变化趋势,且感官品质差异性的区分度也较明显,可应用于卷烟制品的研发和品质控制.
Aiming at the problems that the evaluation results of the existing cigarette sensory quality evaluation methods were not obvious and the change trend was not clear,a new comparative evaluation method of tobacco sensory quality was established.The specific process was as follows:using the expert consultation method and combining with the actual evaluation experience,according to the degree of consumer concern,each sensory quality evaluating indicator of elegance,satisfaction,comfort and ease was given weight.The evaluation results of each smoking evaluation person were calculated by mathematical statistics method,and the sub items and overall scores of each sensory quality evaluating indicator were obtained.According to the scores,the difference degree and change direction of sensory quality were determined.The feasibility verification results showed that the method could distinguish the sensory quality from the score when the change of sensory quality was small.It could not only reflect the difference degree of the overall sensory quality,but also reflect the change trend of the overall and individual sensory quality evaluation indicators,and the differentiation of sensory quality differences was obvious.This method could be applied to the development and quality control of cigarette products.
作者
李春光
王霈显
郜海民
丁美宙
熊安言
王二彬
文秋成
鲍文华
LI Chunguang;WANG Peixian;GAO Haimin;DING Meizhou;XIONG Anyan;WANG Erbin;WEN Qiucheng;BAO Wenhua(Technology Center,China Tobacco He′nan Industrial Co.,Ltd.,Zhengzhou 450000,China;Gold Leaf Manufacturing Center,China Tobacco He′nan Industrial Co.,Ltd.,Zhengzhou 450000,China)
出处
《轻工学报》
CAS
2020年第4期34-39,共6页
Journal of Light Industry
基金
河南中烟工业有限责任公司研究项目(ZW201802)。
关键词
卷烟制品
感官品质
对比评价
评价指标
评价方法
cigarette product
sensory quality
comparative evaluation
evaluating indicator
evaluation method