期刊文献+

护士病人安全能力自评量表的汉化及信效度检验 被引量:3

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version on the Patient Safety Competency Self-Evaluation scale among nurses
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的翻译引进病人安全能力自评量表并对其信度和效度进行检验。方法以Brislin翻译模型为基础,采用两人直译-回译法,通过专家小组评议及跨文化调适,形成中文版病人安全能力自评量表。采取方便抽样的方法选取544名护士进行调查,分析其信度、效度。结果中文版病人安全能力自评量表共提取3个公因子,解释方差贡献率为77.868%,量表的Cronbach'sα系数为0.985,各维度Cronbach'sα系数分别为0.983、0.971、0.951;量表的折半信度为0.890,各维度的折半信度分别为0.946、0.936、0.929;量表水平的内容效度中全体一致性S-CVI为0.949,平均S-CVI为0.990。结论中文版病人安全能力自评量表具有良好的信度、效度,可作为我国护士病人安全能力自我评价的有效工具。 Objective To translate the English version of the Patient Safety Competency Self-Evaluation(PSCSE)scale into Chinese and evaluate the reliability and validity.Methods Based on the Brislin translation model,the Chinese version of PSCSE was introduced by adopting the back-translation and through expert panel review and cross-cultural adaptation.And used convenience sampling method,investigated 544 nurses to analyze the reliability and validity.Results Factor analysis indicated three dimensions of the scale and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 77.868%.Internal consistency was confirmed by Cronbach'sαcoefficient of 0.985,the Cronbach'sαof three factors was 0.983,0.971 and 0.951 respectively.The split half reliability was 0.890 for total scale and 0.946,0.936 and 0.929 for its dimensions.The S-CVI/UA was 0.949 and S-CVI/Ave was 0.990.Conclusion The Chinese version of PSCSE shows good reliability and validity,that can be used as a valid tool to assess the patient safety competency of nurses in China.
作者 刘欣怡 张永佳 田川 叶璐璐 李玲 LIU Xinyi;ZHANG Yongjia;TIAN Chuan;YE Lulu;LI Ling(School of Nursing,Harbin Medical University,Harbin 150000,China;School of Nursing,Yangzhou University,Yangzhou 225009,China;Department of Cardiology,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University,Harbin 150000,China)
出处 《护理管理杂志》 2020年第6期387-392,共6页 Journal of Nursing Administration
基金 黑龙江省教育厅大学生创新创业训练计划项目(201710226037) 哈尔滨医科大学创新科学研究资助项目(2017RWZX04)。
关键词 护士 病人安全能力 自评量表 信度 效度 nurse patient safety competency self-assessment scale reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献148

共引文献1360

同被引文献36

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部