期刊文献+

反制美国“长臂管辖”之道——基于法国重塑经济主权的视角 被引量:23

The Way to Counter US Long-arm Jurisdiction:From the Perspective of France’s Reshaping of Economic Sovereignty
原文传递
导出
摘要 “长臂管辖”已逐渐代替传统军事武器,成为美国维护国际政治影响力和经济利益的重要手段和工具,其滥用对他国经济主权构成了严重威胁。鉴于对“长臂管辖”的研究已经超出传统法律范畴,本文从政治经济学角度进行扩展,基于国际经济竞争、全球治理挑战、大国战略博弈三个维度来解释美国滥用“长臂管辖”的动因,并对其背后的政治、经济和战略考量等进行深入剖析。结合法国遭受“长臂管辖”打压的历史教训,文章系统梳理了近年来法国以重塑经济主权为核心的反制措施:一方面,在欧盟层面积极推动建立相关“防御性”措施,抵御美国霸权主义行径;另一方面,在国内采取“攻防兼具”的思路部署相关立法和经济政策工具,并取得积极成效。比较而言,法国经验具有一定的参考和借鉴价值,为他国反制美国“长臂管辖”提供了重要启示。 Long-arm jurisdiction has gradually replaced traditional military means and become an extended instrument for the US to maintain its international political influence and economic interests.The abuse of this instrument poses a serious threat to the economic sovereignty of the other countries.In view of the fact that the study on long-arm jurisdiction has surpassed well beyond the limits of traditional legal studies,this paper examines its political,economic and strategic dynamics and priorities with the help of the IPE theory and through the lens of international economic competition,global governance challenge and great power politics.This paper as well investigates the lessons that France has learned from its past experiences in dealing with the US long-arm jurisdiction and the countermeasures it has taken which concentrate on the reshaping of the economic sovereignty.On the one hand,France actively promotes the defensive measures at the EU level to resist US hegemonism.While on the other hand,it adopts both offensive and defensive legislation and economic policy tools.France’s experience will be a relevant reference for China in developing its relations with the US.
作者 杨成玉 YANG Chengyu
出处 《欧洲研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第3期1-31,I0003,共32页 Chinese Journal of European Studies
基金 国家社会科学基金青年项目“‘一带一路’倡议框架下中欧产能合作研究”(项目编号:17CGJ008)的阶段性成果。
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献86

  • 1许振洲.变化中的法国政治制度[J].国际政治研究,1996,17(3):10-15. 被引量:2
  • 2柳剑平,郑绪涛.美国对外经济制裁发展趋势及其对我国的启示[J].太平洋学报,2005,13(5):5-14. 被引量:4
  • 3王晓德.对欧洲上层社会消极美国观的历史考察[J].欧洲研究,2006,24(3):51-67. 被引量:6
  • 4K. A. Rowman,Sanctions beyond Borders: Multinational Corporations and U. S. Economic Statecraft, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc. ,2001, p. 172.
  • 5Anon," Constructing the State Extraterritorially: Jurisdictional Discourse, the National Interest, and Transnational Norms," Harvard Law Review,Vol. 103, Issue 6, April 1990, p. 1276.
  • 6George E. Shambough, State, Firms, and Power :Successful Sanctions in United States Foreign Policy, N. Y. : State University of New York Press, 1999, p. 216.
  • 7K.A. Rowman, Sanctions beyond Borders: Multinational Corporations and U. S. Economic Statecraft, p. 86.
  • 8David Leyton - Brown, ed. , The Utility of International Economic Sanctions, London: Croom Helm, 1987, pp. 256-257.
  • 9Joseph P. Griffin and Michael N. Calabrese, "Coping with Extraterritoriality Disputes, " Journal of World Trade, Vol. 22, No. 1,1988, p. 9.
  • 10American Law Institute, The Restatement of the Revised Foreign Relations Law of the United States (Third) , St. Paul, Minn. :American Law Institute Publishers, 1987, p. 239 .

共引文献54

引证文献23

二级引证文献98

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部