近代私家藏书楼的“脱嵌”与“再嵌”:对图书馆学科史建构的修正

The Disembedding and Reembedding of Modern Private Book-collecting Houses: To Correct the Construction of Library Science History

图书馆学科史建构中以西方为中心的概念工具"图书馆"与藏书楼等义,"封建藏书楼衰,近代图书馆兴"等观点未能摆脱西方历史分期背后的欧洲中心观。实际上,无论是地域还是空间,为数众多的藏书楼在近代的命运走向并不一致。藏书楼与藏书家、藏书楼与中国社会文明内部之间形成了互动与整合。在西方概念工具下只突出了藏书楼的"藏书"功能,导致藏书楼从中国社会整体性中的"脱嵌",藏书楼主体性的"再嵌"问题也体现了中国现代性下自身概念工具建设的重要性。对图书馆学科史建构的修正,有助于建设中国特色的图书馆学科史。

In the construction of Library Science History, modern Western conceptual tools such as library and book-collecting house have the same meaning, and some views didn’t overcome the influence of a West-centered theory, such as that feudal book-collecting houses declined while modern libraries were thriving.A big number of modern book-collecting houses had different fates in modern times actually in terms of region or space.Interaction and integration took place between book-collecting houses and book-collectors, between book-collecting houses and inner parts of Chinese civilization.In accordance with Western conceptual tools, the book-collecting role was highlighted, which led to the disembedding of book-collecting houses from Chinese society as a whole.Therefore, the subjective reembedding of book-collecting houses also indicates the importance of a conceptual tool construction in modern China, and is helpful for the construction of library science history with Chinese characteristics.