期刊文献+

不同腰麻用药对高龄骨科手术患者的麻醉效果比较 被引量:1

Comparison of anesthesia effects of different spinal anesthesia drugs on elderly patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨不同腰麻用药对高龄骨科手术患者的麻醉效果。方法:2018年10月-2019年10月收治骨科手术治疗的患者800例,随机分为两组,各400例。均进行腰麻操作。观察组采用甲磺酸罗哌麻醉,对照组采用盐酸罗哌麻醉。比较麻醉效果。结果:两组感觉阻滞起效时间、痛觉阻滞起效时间、运动阻滞起效时间、运动恢复时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组不良反应率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:甲磺酸罗哌和盐酸罗哌在高龄骨科手术患者的麻醉效果较好,但甲磺酸罗哌不良反应少。 Objective:To investigate the anesthetic effect of different spinal anesthesia on elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.Methods:From October 2018 to October 2019,800 patients who underwent orthopedic surgery were selected,they were randomly divided into the two groups with 400 casess in each group.Spinal anesthesia was performed in all patients.The observation group was anesthetized with ropivacaine methanesulfonate.The control group was anesthetized with ropivacaine hydrochloride.The anesthetic effects were compared.Results:There was no significant difference in the onset time of sensory block,pain block,motor block and motor recovery between the two groups(P>0.05).The adverse reaction rate in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Ropium methanesulfonate and ropium hydrochloride have better anesthetic effect in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery,but the adverse reactions of ropium mesylate are less.
作者 龚水英 孟俊忠 Gong Shuiying;Meng Junzhong(Department of Anesthesiology,the First People's Hospital of Xianning City,Hubei Province,Hubei Xianning 437000;Yongan Community Health Service Center of Xian'an District,Xianning City,Hubei Xianning 437000)
出处 《中国社区医师》 2020年第20期44-45,共2页 Chinese Community Doctors
关键词 腰-硬联合麻醉 甲磺酸罗哌 盐酸罗哌 Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia Ropium methanesulfonate Ropa hydrochloride
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献20

  • 1徐建青,朱波,叶铁虎,吴新民,秦翔,王庚,许幸,于布为,李一亮,周静芳,王玉萍.甲磺酸罗哌卡因与盐酸罗哌卡因硬膜外麻醉的临床研究(英文)[J].中国临床药理学与治疗学,2004,9(8):872-875. 被引量:14
  • 2阮祥才,佘守章,许立新,董源洪.三种椎管内麻醉在70岁以上患者人工关节置换术中应用的比较[J].中华老年医学杂志,2005,24(10):749-752. 被引量:22
  • 3[1]Ekenstam B, Egner B, Pettersson G. Local Anaesthetic I. Nalkyl pyrrolidine and N-alkyl piperidine carboxylic acid amides [J]. Acta Chem Scand, 1957;11:1183-90
  • 4[2]Akerman B, Hellberg IB, Trosvik C. Primary evaluation of the local anaesthetic properties of the amino amide agent ropivacaine (LEA 103)[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 1988;32(7):571 -5
  • 5[3]Scott DB, Lee A, Fagan D, Bowler GM, Bloomfield P, Lundh R. Acute toxicity of ropivacaine compared to bupivacaine[J].Anesth Analg, 1989;69:563 - 9
  • 6[4]Finucane BT, Sandler AN, McKenna J, Reid D, Milner AL,Friedlander M, et al. A double-blind comparison of ropivacaine 0.5%, 0.75%, 1.0% and bupivacaine 0.5%, injected epidurally, in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy[J]. Can J Anaesth, 1996;43(5) :442- 9
  • 7[5]Wood MB, Rubin AP. A comparison of epidural 1% ropivacaine and 0.75 % bupivacaine for lower abdominal gynecologic surgery[ J]. Anesth Analg, 1993; 76:1274 - 8
  • 8[6]Brockway MS, Bannister J, McClure JH, McKeown D, Wildsmith JAW. Comparison of extradural ropivacaine and bupivacaine[ J]. Br J Anaesth, 1991 ;66(1):31 - 7
  • 9[7]Peduto VA, Baroncini S, Montanini S, Proietti R, Rosignoli L,Tufano R, et al. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of epidural levobupivacaine 0.5 % with epidural ropivacaine 0.75% for lower limb procedures[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2003;20(12) :979 - 83
  • 10Malinovsky JM,Rencuca G,corre pl.et al.Intrathecal bupivacaine in humans:Influence of volume and baricity of solutions[J].Anesthesiology,1999,91:1260-1266.

共引文献24

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部