摘要
本文从反倾销税率计算的直接依据出发,利用1980-2015年美国反倾销调查的案例数据,实证分析了影响反倾销税率的各因素的作用。不仅关注了国别、"非市场经济地位"、替代国选择等因素,还从企业层级出发定量识别企业应诉行为的作用。研究发现:(1)入世前,中国企业没有遭遇国别上的差别待遇,"非市场经济地位"对反倾销税率没有显著影响;(2)入世后,中国企业的反倾销税率显著高于市场经济国家企业,"非市场经济地位"具有显著的正向影响,并且选择经济发展水平更高的替代国将显著提高反倾销税率;(3)无论入世前后,中国企业不应诉或消极应诉均提高了其最终反倾销税率。(4)企业积极应诉不仅有利于自身争取更低的反倾销税率,而且具有正外部性作用,降低了其他企业的反倾销税率。
Based on the actual practice of calculating anti-dumping duty,this paper empirically studied what factors contributed to the final firm level anti-dumping duty rates,using case-level data on U.S.anti-dumping investigations against Chinese exporters from1980-2015.In addition to exploring the effects of country level characteristics,the"nonmarket economy"status,surrogate country choices,our study also identified the direct effects of firms’responses to the anti-dumping investigations.Our findings include the following:Chinese firms do not receive different treatments and the"non-market economy"status has no significant effect before China’s entering the WTO.Since 2001,however,the anti-dumping duties of Chinese firms have become significantly higher than those of firms from market economy countries,and the"non-market economy"status has had a positive impact on the duty rate.Furthermore,Chinese firms’lack of response or passive responses to the investigations have led to higher final duties no matter whether China is a member of the WTO.More importantly,there exists a positive externality in firms’actively responding to anti-dumping investigations,where,by cooperating in the investigation,the firm decreases not only its own anti-dumping duty rate,but also the duties of other firms.
作者
龙小宁
张靖
LONG Xiaoning;ZHANG Jing
出处
《国际贸易问题》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第7期96-110,共15页
Journal of International Trade
基金
国家自然科学基金应急管理项目“西方国家‘非市场经济地位’标准及‘双反’研究”(71741001)。
关键词
反倾销税率
“非市场经济地位”
替代国选择
企业应诉
Anti-dumping Duty
Non-market Economy
Surrogate Country Choice
Responses to Litigation