摘要
罪刑法定原则经历了绝对的罪刑法定向相对的罪刑法定的历史嬗变,此为空白罪状提供了立法契机,但实践中也存在忽视罪名空白性、空洞引用前置性法规等问题。以盗伐林木罪为例进行分析,总结出空白罪状的解释方法与路径,并基于我国的现实情况,对砍伐经济行为的定罪问题从体系解释与法理方面进行考证,得出不宜认定犯罪的结论。
The principle of legally prescribed punishment has experienced the historical evolution from the absolute principle to the relative principle.This provides a legislative opportunity for blank counts,but in practice there are also issues such as neglecting the blankness of crimes and liberally quoting the pre-existing regulations.Based on the analysis of the crime of stealing forest trees,the explanation method and path of the blank crime are concluded,and according to the actual situation,the textual research on the conviction of logging non-wood product forest is conducted from aspects of the system interpretation and legal principle basis,making a conclusion that its guilty is not taken for granted.
作者
成功
CHENG Gong(School of Law and Public Administration,Hunan University of Technology and Business,Changsha,Hunan,410205,China)
出处
《西安石油大学学报(社会科学版)》
2020年第4期88-94,共7页
Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University:Social Science Edition
关键词
罪刑法定
空白罪状
盗伐林木罪
体系解释
legally prescribed punishment
blankguilt
crime of stealing trees
system interpretation