期刊文献+

CT-电子密度转换曲线误差对IMRT剂量计算结果的影响 被引量:5

Effect of the error of CT-electron density conversion curve on IMRT dose calculation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究CT-相对电子密度转换曲线误差对调强放射治疗(IMRT)计划剂量计算结果的影响。方法:随机选取南方医科大学顺德医院IMRT治疗的宫颈癌患者10例,在Eclipse治疗计划系统中对IMRT计划引入CT-电子密度转换曲线误差(±0.5%、±1.0%、±1.5%、±2.0%和±3.0%),重新计算剂量分布,每例患者得到10个带有误差的新计划并与原计划进行比较。分析转换曲线误差对剂量计算结果的影响,包括靶区相关剂量参数、适形度指数(Conformal Index,CI)、均匀性指数(Homogeneity Index,HI)和脊髓、肾脏、小肠、膀胱、直肠等危及器官体积剂量参数。分析不同转换曲线误差和各剂量参数偏差值之间的关系。结果:转换曲线引入正误差时计划剂量参数降低,引入负误差时计划剂量参数升高,引入的误差越大剂量变化越大。当转换曲线误差为1.5%时,靶区平均覆盖率为94.73%±1.86%,误差继续增大,带来的影响超出临床可接受范围。CI和HI在不同误差的计划之间没有统计学意义(P>0.05)。不同转换曲线误差和各剂量参数偏差值之间存在显著性负相关性(P均<0.001),并利用Matlab得到不同转换曲线误差和各剂量参数偏差值之间的相关公式。结论:当转换曲线误差大于1.5%时,剂量偏差无法满足临床要求。计划系统建模时需建立正确的CT-相对电子密度转换曲线,对CT模拟机要定期QA,以保证治疗计划剂量计算的精度。 Objective To investigate the effect of the error of CT-electron density conversion curve on the calculation of dose distribution of intensity-modulated radiotherapy(IMRT)plan.Methods Ten patients undergoing IMRT for cervical cancer in Shunde Hospital of Southern Medical University were enrolled.Different CT-electron density conversion curve errors(±0.5%,±1.0%,±1.5%,±2.0%and±3.0%)were introduced into IMRT plans in Eclipse treatment planning system for recalculating dose distribution and obtaining 10 new plans for every patient which were then compared with the original plan without conversion curve errors.The effect of conversion curve errors on the dose calculation was discussed by analyzing the related dosimetric parameters,conformity index,homogeneity index of target areas,and the volume-dose parameters of organs-at-risk such as spinal cord,kidney,small intestine,bladder,rectum and so on.The relationships between different conversion curve errors and the deviation value of each dosimetric parameter were analyzed.Results The dosimetric parameters were decreased when positive errors were introduced into IMRT plan while increased when negative errors were introduced.The greater the conversion curve error was,the greater the effects on dosimetric parameters were.When the conversion curve error was 1.5%,the average target coverage was 94.73%+1.86%;and the dosimetric effect coming from larger conversion curve errors(higher than 1.5%)was out of the acceptable range in clinic.No statistical difference was found among plans with different conversion curve errors in conformity index and homogeneity index(P>0.05).There were significant negative correlations between conversion curve errors and the deviation values of different dosimetric parameters(all P<0.001),and the corresponding correlation formulas were obtained by Matlab software.Conclusion With conversion curve error higher than 1.5%,the dosimetric deviation is out of the acceptable range and the dose distribution cannot meet the clinical requirements.An accurate CT-electron density conversion curve should be created when building treatment model by planning system,and the quality assurance of CT-sim should be performed regularly,thereby ensuring the accurate calculation of dose calculation of treatment plan.
作者 朱凤盈 马彦凝 罗锦胜 潘宏威 王远远 蓝茂英 ZHU Fengying;MAYanning;LUO Jinsheng;PAN Hongwei;WANG Yuanyuan;LAN Maoying(Department of Radiation Oncology,Shunde Hospital of Southern Medical University,Foshan 528300,China;Varian Medical Systems,Inc.,Beijing 100176,China;Department of Radiation Oncology,Hefei Ion Medical Center,Hefei 230000,China)
出处 《中国医学物理学杂志》 CSCD 2020年第7期816-821,共6页 Chinese Journal of Medical Physics
基金 广东省自然科学基金(2018A030310678)。
关键词 CT-电子密度转换曲线 误差 调强放射治疗 剂量计算 CT-electron density conversion curve error intensity-modulated radiotherapy dose calculation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献12

  • 1祁振宇,黄劭敏,邓小武.放疗计划CT值的校准检测及其影响因素分析[J].癌症,2006,25(1):110-114. 被引量:53
  • 2MUTIC S, PALTA J R, BUTKER E K, et al. Quality assurance for computed tomography simulators and the computed tomography simulation process: report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 66 [J]. Med Phys, 2003,30 (10) :2762-2793.
  • 3BENEVENTI S, CHIONNE F,GOBBI G, et al. Quantitative CT tomography for radiotherapy treatment planning: calibration phantom andsources of error [J]. Radiother Oncol, 1995, 37 (supplement): 41.
  • 4LUCA C, ANTONELLA F,FRANCESCA B, et al. Dosimetric impact of computed tomography calibration on a commercial treatment planning system for external radiation therapy [J]. Radiother oncol, 1998,48(3) :335-338.
  • 5METCALFE P. Radiotherapy treatment planning [M]// METCALFE P,KRON T, eds. The physics of radiotherapy X-rays. Oxford : Oxford university press, 2000:293-364.
  • 6MACKIE T R, EL-KHATIB E,BATTISTA J, et al. Lung dose correction for 6 and 15 MV X-rays[J]. Med Phys, 1985,12(3) :327.
  • 7CONSTANTINOU C, HARRINGTON J C, CADIEUX R A, et al. Dosimetry at lung-muscle and lung-bone interfaees using 6 MV and 10 MV X-rays and 12-18 MeV electrons [J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1993,15(supplement 1 ) : 244.
  • 8CONSTANTINOU C, HARRINGTON J C, DEWERD L A. An electron density phantom for calibrating CT-based planning computers to correct for heterogeneities [J]. Med Phys,1992, 19(2) :325-332.
  • 9VAN DYK J, BARNETT R B,CYGLER J E, et al. Commissioning and quality assurance of treatment planning computers [J]. Int J RadiatOncol Biol Phys, 1993,26(2) :261-273.
  • 10冯国生,梁远,吴丹玲,蒿艳蓉,陆合明,陈甲信,廖超龙,莫颖,黄翌航.CT值-相对电子密度转换曲线的影响因素分析[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2012,21(3):281-284. 被引量:23

共引文献62

同被引文献37

引证文献5

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部