期刊文献+

Lvis支架辅助弹簧圈血管内栓塞治疗颅内破裂动脉瘤的临床效果和安全性 被引量:5

Clinical effect and safety of Lvis stent-assisted endovascular coil embolization in treating ruptured intracranial aneurysm
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨Lvis支架辅助弹簧圈血管内栓塞治疗颅内破裂动脉瘤中的临床效果和安全性。方法:选取84例颅内破裂动脉瘤患者作为观察对象,随机分为A、B两组,每组42例患者。A组采用Lvis支架辅助弹簧圈血管内栓塞方式进行治疗,B组采用Solitaire支架辅助弹簧圈血管内栓塞方式进行治疗。采用RS评分、Raymond评分和GOS评分对临床效果进行评价,并对治疗后的不良反应发生率及复发率进行分析。结果:RS评分方面,A组为(0.23±0.57)分,B组为(2.48±0.96)分,A组低于B组(P<0.05);Raymond评分方面,A组Ⅰ级发生率为92.24%,B组为78.57%,A组高于B组(P<0.05);GOS评分方面,A组5分的发生率为92.86%,B组为73.81%,A组高于B组(P<0.05)。不良反应发生率方面,A组为2.38%,B组为21.43%,A组低于B组(P<0.05)。复发率方面,A组无一例复发,B组复发率为4.76%,A组低于B组(P<0.05)。结论:Lvis支架辅助弹簧圈血管内栓塞治疗颅内破裂动脉瘤,临床效果好且具有一定安全性。 Objective To investigate the clinical effect and safety of Lvis stent-assisted endovascular coil embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysm.Methods A total of 84 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysm were enrolled in the study and then randomly divided into group A and group B,with 42 patients in each group.Lvis stent-assisted endovascular coil embolization was used in group A,while Solitaire stent-assisted endovascular coil embolization was adopted in group B.Rankin scale(RS),Raymond scale and Glasgow outcome scale(GOS)were used to evaluate the clinical effect,and the incidence of adverse reactions and recurrence rate after treatment were also analyzed.Results The RS score in groupAwas lower than that in group B(0.23+0.57 vs 2.48+0.96,P<0.05).The analysis on Raymond score revealed that the incidence of gradeⅠaneurysm packing in group A was higher than that in group B(92.24%vs 78.57%,P<0.05);and the analysis on GOS score showed that the proportion of 5 points in group A was 92.86%,higher than 73.81%in group B(P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in group A was lower than that in group B(2.38%vs 21.43%,P<0.05).There was no recurrence in group A,but the recurrence rate was 4.76%in group B(P<0.05).Conclusion In the treatment of patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysm,Lvis stent-assisted endovascular coil embolization has satisfactory clinical effects,with certain safety.
作者 叶海泉 黄文超 YE Haiquan;HUANG Wenchao(Department of Neurosurgery,Guidong People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region,Wuzhou 543001,China;ICU,the South Branch of Chenzhou No.1 People's Hospital,Chenzhou 423000,China)
出处 《中国医学物理学杂志》 CSCD 2020年第7期898-902,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Physics
关键词 颅内破裂动脉瘤 Lvis支架 弹簧圈血管内栓塞 ruptured intracranial aneurysm Lvis stent endovascular coil embolization
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献54

  • 1LUBICZ B, FRANCOIS O, LEVIVIER M, et al. Preliminary experience with the enterprise stent for endovascular treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms: potential advantages and limiting characteristies[J]. Neurosurgery, 2008,62 ( 5 ) : 1063- 1069-1070.
  • 2PELUSO J P, VAN ROOIJ W J, SLUZEWSKI M, et al. A new self-expandable nitinol stent for the treatment of wide neck aneurysms: initial clinical experience[J]. AJNR. Ameri- can Journal of Neuroradiology, 2008,29(7) : 1405- 1408.
  • 3HUANG Q, XU Y, HONG B, et al. Stent-assisted emboliza- tioln of wide-neck anterior communicating artery aneurysms: review of 21 consecutive cases[J]. AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 2009,30(8) 1502-1506.
  • 4HUANG Q H, WU Y F, XU Y, et al. Vascular geometry change because of endovascular stent placement for anterior communicating artery aneurysms[J]. AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 2011,32(9) :1721-1725.
  • 5van Rooij WJ, Keeren GJ, Peluso JP, et al. Clinical and angiographic results of coiling of 196 very small (< or :3 mm) intracranial aneurysms[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2009, 30(4): 835-839.
  • 6Salary M, Quigley MR, Wilberger JE. Relation among aneurysm size, amount of subarachnoid blood, and clinical outcome [J]. J Neurosurg, 2007, 107(1): 13-17.
  • 7Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized trial[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2002, 11 (6): 304-314.
  • 8Molyneux A J, Birks J, Clarke A, et al. The durability of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: 18 year follow-up of the UK cohort of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT)[J]. Lancet, 2015, 385(9969): 691-697.
  • 9Lanzino G, Kallmes DF. Endovascular treatment of very small ruptured intracranial aneurysms [J]. J Neurosurg, 2008, 108 (6): 1087.
  • 10Nguyen TN, Raymond J, Guilbert F, et al. Association of endovascular therapy of very small ruptured aneurysms with higher rates of procedure-related rupture [J]. J Neurosurg, 2008, 108 (6): 1088-1092.

共引文献114

同被引文献54

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部