期刊文献+

SSGF建造体系与装配式及传统建造体系的对比 被引量:2

The Comparison of SSGF Construction System with Prefabricated Construction System and Traditional Construction System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为业界新型建筑工业化探索的重要实践成果,SSGF建造体系、装配式建造体系带来了建筑业的巨大变革。基于工程项目管理体系知识结构,从系统的视角构建了综合考虑过程与产出维度的综合绩效表现指标体系,以实现SSGF建造体系与装配式建造体系及传统建造体系的对比分析。考虑到评价指标之间的关联性及不确定性,在对传统层次分析法作出契合模糊积分改进的基础上构建了AHP-Choquet积分评价模型,并结合实例验证了方法的可行性。 As important practical achievements of new-type building industrialization,the SSGF industrialized construction system and prefabricated construction system have brought great changes in the construction industry.Based on the knowledge structure of the engineering project management system,this paper constructs a comprehensive performance index system including the process and output dimensions,aiming to achieve a comparative analysis between the SSGF industrialized construction system,prefabricated construction system and traditional construction system.Considering the correlation and uncertainty between the evaluation indicators,this paper builds an AHP-Choquet integral evaluation model based on the improvement of the traditional analytic hierarchy process,and finally verifies the feasibility of the method with examples.
作者 华一鸣 李忠富 张胜昔 HUA Yi-ming;LI Zhong-fu;ZHANG Sheng-xi(Department of Construction Management,Dalian University of Technology,Dalian 116024,China)
出处 《工程管理学报》 2020年第3期23-27,共5页 Journal of Engineering Management
关键词 建筑工业化 SSGF建造体系 装配式建造体系 CHOQUET模糊积分 building industrialization SSGF construction system prefabricated construction system Choquet fuzzy integral
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献70

  • 1周密,马扬.项目经理绩效考核指标设计与评价[J].中国人力资源开发,2005,22(7):70-73. 被引量:8
  • 2任丽华.模糊综合评价法的数学建模方法简介[J].商场现代化,2006(07Z):8-9. 被引量:39
  • 3孟宪海.关键绩效指标KPI——国际最新的工程项目绩效评价体系[J].建筑经济,2007(2):50-52. 被引量:37
  • 4Sugeno M.Theory of fuzzy integrals and its application[D].Tokyo:Tokyo Institute of Technology,1974.
  • 5Grabisch M.A new algorithm for identifying fuzzy measures and its application to pattern recognition[C] //International Joint Conference of 4th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and the 2nd International Fuzzy Engineering Symposium,Yokohama,Japan,1995:145-150.
  • 6Kojadinovic I.Minimum variance capacity identification[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2007,177(1):498-514.
  • 7Combarro E F,Miranda P.Identification of fuzzy measures from sample data with genetic algorithms[J].Com-puters & Operations Research,2006,33:3046-3066.
  • 8Chen Y W.Implementing an analytical hierarchy process by fuzzy integral[J].International Journal of Fuzzy Systems,2001,3(3):493-502.
  • 9Takahagi E.On Identification methods of λ-fuzzy measures using weights and λ[J].Japanese Journal of Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2000,12(5):665-676.
  • 10Marichal J L,Roubens M.Dependence between criteria and multiple criteria decision aid[C] //2nd International Workshop on Preferences and Decisions,Trento,Italy,1998:69-75.

共引文献225

同被引文献9

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部