期刊文献+

驾驶模拟环境中激进驾驶行为的影响因素分析 被引量:5

Influencing Factors of Aggressive Driving Behavior in Driving Simulation Environment
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了分析驾驶人在驾驶模拟试验过程中出现的相对实际驾驶的激进驾驶行为的影响因素,采用计划行为理论构建心理认知模型。基于计划行为理论设计问卷调查私家车驾驶人对"在驾驶模拟过程中激进驾驶"行为的信念、态度、主观规范、行为感知控制、意向与行为。采用结构方程模型得到观察变量与基本构念以及基本构念内部的相关关系,并最终分析得到影响驾驶人激进驾驶行为的主要因素。通过先导性调查问卷以及正式调查问卷的投放,最终得到217个有效的样本。研究结果表明:心理认知模型具有良好的适配性,其卡方自由度比为1.802,RMSEA值为0.062;态度、行为感知控制是影响驾驶人行为的主要因素,主观规范对行为的影响相对较小;各信念与对应的态度、主观规范及行为感知控制之间存在显著关联,各信念的测量模型的适配性良好,卡方自由度比、RMSEA等指标基本满足要求。采用完整的计划行为理论结构同时从标准获取构念和自行获取构念的角度解释了驾驶人对"在驾驶模拟过程中激进驾驶"行为的心理认知,研究成果可用于驾驶模拟-自然驾驶行为数据差异性控制,驾驶模拟试验规范化方法构建。 Compared with the actual driving situation,driver’s driving behavior is more aggressive in the driving simulation experiment.In order to analyze the impact factor of driver’s behavior,a psychological cognitive model is proposed based on the theory of planned behavior(TPB).Two questionnaires were designed to collect the private car owner’s salient beliefs,attitude,subjective norm,perceived behavior control,intention,and behavior.Then the structural equation model was used to estimate the correlation between the observed variables and the correlation between the observed variable and the fundamental element of TPB.After the pilot and formal investigation 217 valid samples were obtained.Fitting result of the structural equation model is acceptable(CMIN/DF is 1.802<2.000,RMSEA is 0.062<0.080).Attitude and perceived behavior control are two important factors compare to subjective norm.There is a significant relationship between beliefs and corresponding attitude,subjective norm and behavioral perception control.The measurement model of each belief has good adaptability.CMIN/DF,RMSEA and other indicators basically meet the requirements.This study analyzes the driver’s psychological cognition of aggressive driving behavior in the driving simulation experiment using complete TPB structure and analyzes the behavior from the perspective of standard measurement and self-designed measurement.The result of this study can be used to control driving behavior differences between simulation experiment and actual driving.The result can also be utilized to building a standardization experiment method for driving simulation experiment.
作者 张彦宁 郭忠印 孙智 ZHANG Yan-ning;GUO Zhong-yin;SUN Zhi(Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education,Tongji University,Shanghai 201804,China;China State Construction Shandong Investment Corporation,Jinan 250101,Shandong,China;China State Construction Infrastructure Corporation,Beijing 100044,China)
出处 《中国公路学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第6期129-136,共8页 China Journal of Highway and Transport
基金 中国建筑股份有限公司科技研发计划项目(CSCEC-2017-Z-20)。
关键词 交通工程 行为心理认知 计划行为理论 激进驾驶行为 驾驶模拟 结构方程模型 traffic engineering psychological cognition of behavior theory of planned behavior aggressive driving driving simulation structural equation model
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献121

共引文献110

同被引文献44

引证文献5

二级引证文献18

相关主题

;
使用帮助 返回顶部