庄子美学非悖论——为庄子美学的合法性辩护

The Aesthetics of Chuang-tzu庄子Is Not a Paradox:A Defence of the Legitimacy of Chuang Tzu’s Aesthetics

针对章启群先生把"《庄子》美学"作为悖论的问题,本文将为庄子美学的合法性进行辩护。首先,本文采用了彭富春"无原则批判"的方法,以此划分庄子美学的四个边界。其次,本文辨析了庄子关于美的言说,以此揭示庄子美学的诗意性。然后,本文立足于庄子自身的道,澄清了庄子美学的合法性问题。最后,本文从伦理学的角度出发,指出了庄子美学的可能道路。由此,本文得出结论:庄子美学非悖论。即使庄子美学存在章启群先生所谓的悖论,作为悖论的"《庄子》美学"也反映了庄子美学的真相。

In response to the opinion presented by Zhang Qiqun章启群that the aesthetics of Chuang Tzu’is a paradox,this paper will defend the legitimacy of Chuang Tzu’s aesthetics.First of all,this paper introduces Peng Fuchun彭富春’s method of"the critique without principles,"thereby defines the boundaries of Chuang Tzu’s aesthetics.Secondly,this paper analyzes Chuang Tzu’s words of beauty,and thereby reveals the poetic quality of Chuang Tzu’s aesthetics.Then,this paper clarifies the question of legitimacy of Chuang Tzu’s aesthetics based on the Taoism of Chuang-tzu himself.Last but not least,this paper indicates the possible way of Chuang Tzu’s aesthetics from the perspective of ethnics.Thus,this paper draws a conclusion that the aesthetic of Chuang-tzu is not a paradox.Even if Chuang Tzu’s aesthetics has the paradox as Zhang Qiqun argued,it still reflects the truth of Chuang Tzu’s aesthetics.