期刊文献+

移动支付应用的包容性设计评估 被引量:4

EVALUATING THE INCLUSIVITY OF MOBILE PAYMENT APPS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究从设计评估的视角出发,探索包容性设计实践,以移动支付应用为例,构建包容性设计评估框架与方法,帮助设计师洞察“设计排斥”。通过文献研究,从人机交互过程的功能与情感层面,总结影响移动支付应用包容性的要素;依据互联网行业产品开发特点,构建起兼具可靠性与效率的评估框架与方法;最后通过关键用户访谈、专家评估等实证研究对框架进行验证与迭代。本研究得出的评估框架、方法为设计师践行包容性设计提供方法指导,以包容更为广泛的人群融入移动互联生活。 From the perspective of design evaluation,this study explores the practice of inclusive design.Taking mobile payment applications as an example,this study constructs an inclusive design evaluation framework and methods to help designers gain insights into"design exclusion".Through literature review,the authors summarised the factors that affect the inclusiveness of mobile application products from the functional and emotional aspects of the human-computer interaction process,and combined the characteristics of Internet product development to create an evaluation framework and methods with reliability and efficiency.The framework was iterated and verified through empirical studies including key user interviews and expert evaluation.The inclusive design evaluation framework of mobile payment applications derived from this study provides designers with guidance on the practice of inclusive design,so as to include a wider range of people in the mobile Internet life.
出处 《设计》 2020年第15期78-81,共4页 Design
关键词 移动支付 包容性设计 包容性评估 人机交互 设计排斥 Mobile payment Inclusive design Inclusivity evaluation Humancomputer interaction Design exclusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献74

  • 1王效孟,徐娜子.产品易用性设计——沟通人机关系的桥梁[J].哈尔滨职业技术学院学报,2008(3):28-29. 被引量:5
  • 2于东玖,吴晓莉.设计中易用性原则与情感的关系[J].包装工程,2006,27(6):308-309. 被引量:43
  • 3何灿群.通用设计的理念与方法探析[J].包装工程,2007,28(2):119-121. 被引量:13
  • 4徐炜.浅谈产品设计与“美”[J].台州学院学报,2007,29(2):93-96. 被引量:2
  • 5PREECE Jennifer,ROGERS Yvonne,SHARP Hden:交互设计--超越人机交互[M].北京:电子工业出版社.2003.
  • 6Clarkson P J,Coleman R. History of Inclusive Design in the UK[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2015,46 ; 235 247.
  • 7Clarkson P J, Coleman R, Keates S. Inclusive design.- Design for the whole populationM. New York Springer Science Business Media, 2013.
  • 8GoodmawD J, Ward J, Hosking I, et al. A comparison of methods currently used in inclusive design [-J . Applied ergonomics, 2014,45 (4) 886-894.
  • 9Umesh P, Patrick L, John C P. A framework for analytical inclusive design evaluation E J . Guidelines for a Decision Support Method Adapted to NPD Processes, 2007.
  • 10Langdon P, Johnson D, Huppert F, et al. A framework for collecting inclusive design data for the UK population l-J. Applied ergonomics, 2015,46 : 318-324.

共引文献120

同被引文献37

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部