期刊文献+

RFS低阳性评分慢性咽炎患者抗反流疗效观察 被引量:8

Clinical observation of the anti-reflux treatment for the chronic pharyngitis patients with the reflux finding score from 8 to 10
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:观察临床诊断慢性咽炎且伴反流体征评分量表(RFS)低阳性评分(8~10分)患者抗反流的疗效。方法:选取临床诊断为慢性咽炎且RFS评分为8~10分的患者112例,随机分为治疗组和对照组。治疗组予以质子泵抑制剂+胃肠促动力药抗反流治疗及清咽利喉中成药,对照组予以单纯清咽利喉中成药,比较两组治疗有效率及各组治疗前后的症状体征评分变化。结果:治疗组总有效率(77.36%)高于对照组(30.61%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。治疗组治疗前后各症状VAS评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:临床诊断慢性咽炎且伴有RFS阳性低评分患者,予以中成药治疗同时加用抗反流药物可明显改善症状。 Objective:To evaluate the anti-reflux treatment efficacy for the chronic pharyngitis patients with the reflux finding score(RFS)from 8-10.Method:One hundred and twelve patients with clinical diagnosis of chronic pharyngitis and RFS score of 8-10 were randomly divided into control and treatment groups.The treantment group was given the proton pump inhibitors,gastrointestinal motility drugs and the traditional Chinese patent drugs(treatment group).The control group was given only the traditional Chinese patent drugs(control group).Result:The visual analogue scale(VAS)of the patients in treatment group declined significantly after treatment.The efficacy of treatment group was significantly higher than that of control group(77.36%vs 30.61%,P<0.01).Conclusion:For the patients with chronic pharyngitis with RFS 8-10,anti-reflux treatment should be used together with traditional Chinese patent drugs.
作者 曾甦漪 陈静 魏雪梅 兰德 张杰 ZENG Suyi;CHEN Jing;WEI Xuemei;LAN De;ZHANG Jie(Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery,Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University,Chengdu,610081,China)
出处 《临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2020年第5期441-443,共3页 Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head And Neck Surgery
基金 四川省医学科研青年创新课题(No:Q14003)。
关键词 咽炎 反流症状指数量表 反流体征评分量表 视觉模拟评分法 pharyngitis reflux symptomindex reflux finding score visual analogue scale
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献35

  • 1倪鑫,马丽晶,韩德民,葛秀明.喉接触性肉芽肿的治疗[J].中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2007,14(2):79-81. 被引量:29
  • 2农东晓,农辉图,徐志文,唐安洲,王安宇.喉非特异性肉芽肿的治疗[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2007,21(14):649-651. 被引量:9
  • 3CARROL T L, GARTNER-SCHMIDT J, STAT- HAM M M,et al. Vocal process granuloma and glot- tal insufficiency., an overlooked etiology? [J]. Laryn- goscope, 2010,120 : 114- 120.
  • 4YLITALO R, LINDESTAD P A. Laryngeal finding in patients with contact granuloma: a long time follow-up study[J]. Acta Otolaryngol, 2000,120,655- 659.
  • 5YLITALO R, RAMEL S. Gastroesophagopharyngeal reflux in patients with contact granuloma: a prospec- tive controlled study[J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2002,111 : 178- 183.
  • 6DUAN H G,JIN H J,ZHENG C Q, et al. Surgery and proton pump inhibitors for treatment of vocal process granulomas [J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2013, 270.2921-2926.
  • 7李大庆主译.咽喉部反流、喉部感染和系统性疾病的喉部表现[M]//Ballenger耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学喉与支气管食管病学分册.17版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:994-1007.
  • 8FASS R, OFMAN-JOSHUA J. Gastroesophageal re- flux disease should we adopt a new conceptual frame- work? [J]. Am J Gastroentroenterrol, 2002, 97: 1901-1909.
  • 9陈灏珠,林果为,王吉耀,主编.消化系统疾病-胃食管反流病[M].实用内科学,14版.北京:北京人民卫生出版社,2013:1897-1900.
  • 10HABERMANN W, KIESLER K, EHERER A, et al. Short-term therapeutic trial of proton pump inhibitors in suspected extraesophageal reflux [ J ]. J Voice, 2002,16:425-432.

共引文献79

同被引文献88

引证文献8

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部