摘要
推定分为事实推定与法律推定。对于事实推定,应在经验法则类型化的基础上,着重解决事实推定的正当性的问题,将事实推定分为间接证明和表见证明两种类型并赋予不同的效力。对于法律推定,则应侧重于对法律推定的边界做出更清晰的描述,对于法律推定的效力作出更精确的界定和补充。
Presumption is divided into factual presumption and legal presumption.As for the factual presumption,we shall focus on solving the problem of the legitimacy of the factual presumption on the basis of the categorization of the rule of thumb,and divide the fact presumption into two types--indirect proof and apparent proof,with different effects.As for the legal presumption,we shall focus on a clearer description of the boundary of the legal presumption and a more accurate definition and supplement of the validity of the legal presumption.
作者
纪格非
Ji Gefei(Civil,commercial and Economic Law College,China University of Political Science and Law(CUPL),Beijing,100088,China)
出处
《证据科学》
2020年第3期329-342,共14页
Evidence Science
关键词
法律推定
事实推定
经验法则
拟制
Legal presumption
Factual presumption
Rule of thumb
Fiction