期刊文献+

《民事诉讼证据规定》中的推定问题 被引量:11

The presumption rules in the"Civil Procedure Evidence Regulations"
原文传递
导出
摘要 推定分为事实推定与法律推定。对于事实推定,应在经验法则类型化的基础上,着重解决事实推定的正当性的问题,将事实推定分为间接证明和表见证明两种类型并赋予不同的效力。对于法律推定,则应侧重于对法律推定的边界做出更清晰的描述,对于法律推定的效力作出更精确的界定和补充。 Presumption is divided into factual presumption and legal presumption.As for the factual presumption,we shall focus on solving the problem of the legitimacy of the factual presumption on the basis of the categorization of the rule of thumb,and divide the fact presumption into two types--indirect proof and apparent proof,with different effects.As for the legal presumption,we shall focus on a clearer description of the boundary of the legal presumption and a more accurate definition and supplement of the validity of the legal presumption.
作者 纪格非 Ji Gefei(Civil,commercial and Economic Law College,China University of Political Science and Law(CUPL),Beijing,100088,China)
出处 《证据科学》 2020年第3期329-342,共14页 Evidence Science
关键词 法律推定 事实推定 经验法则 拟制 Legal presumption Factual presumption Rule of thumb Fiction
  • 相关文献

同被引文献231

引证文献11

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部