期刊文献+

3.0 T磁共振成像对直肠癌环周切缘的评估价值研究 被引量:2

Clinical value of 3.0 T MRI in evaluating circumferential margin of rectal cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨3.0 T磁共振成像(MRI)对直肠癌环周切缘(CRM)的评估价值。方法抽取绍兴市人民医院(浙江大学绍兴医院)2016年3月至2018年5月收治的病理检查明确的直肠癌患者105例为观察对象,术前均行MRI检查,与术后病理检查的CRM进行评估,分析MRI对CRM评估的准确率、灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果术前MRI评估CRM与术后病理结果一致92例;术前评估阳性,术后显示阴性12例;术前评估阴性,术后显示阳性1例。其准确率为87.62%(92/105),灵敏度为50.00%(1/2),特异度为88.35%(91/103),阳性预测值为7.69%(1/13),阴性预测值为98.91%(91/92)。结论MRI在评估CRM时准确率、特异度和阴性预测值较高,而灵敏度和阳性预测值偏低,其原因考虑与术中扩大切除范围有关。 Objective To evaluate the clinical value of 3.0 MRI imaging in evaluating the circumferential margin of rectal cancer.Methods From March 2016 to May 2018,105 cases of rectal cancer with definite pathology in Shaoxing People's Hospital were evaluated by preoperative MRI and post-operative pathology.The accuracy,sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value and negative predictive value were obtained.Results The accuracy,sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 87.62%(92/105),50.00%(1/2),88.35%(91/103),7.69%(1/13)and 98.91%(91/92),respectively.Conclusion The accuracy of MRI in evaluating CRM is higher,the specificity and negative predictive value are higher,while the sensitivity and positive predictive value are lower.The reason is related to enlarging the resection scope during operation.Whether it will affect the prognosis of patients needs further follow-up results.
作者 潘伟火 王奇 应晓江 沈毅 Pan Weihuo;Wang Qi;Ying Xiaojiang;Shen Yi(Department of Anorectal Surgery,Shaoxing People's Hospital(Shaoxing Hospital of Zhejiang University),Shaoxing,Zhejiang 310000,China)
机构地区 绍兴市人民医院
出处 《中国基层医药》 CAS 2020年第12期1445-1448,共4页 Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
基金 浙江省绍兴市科技计划项目(2015B70057)。
关键词 磁共振成像 直肠肿瘤 环周切缘 敏感性与特异性 阴性预测值 阳性预测值 Magnetic resonance imaging Rectal neoplasms Circumferential resection margin Sensitivity and specificity Negative predictive value Positive predictive value
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献25

  • 1王存,周总光,王昭,李立,陈岱云,郑阳春,赵高平,刘卫平.大组织切片研究直肠癌在直肠系膜内及环周切缘的播散[J].四川大学学报(医学版),2004,35(5):723-726. 被引量:4
  • 2National Comprehensive Cancer Network.Clinical Practice Guidlines of Rectal Cancer.2011v1.http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/rectal.pdf.
  • 3Heald RJ,Moran BJ,Ryall RD,et al.Rectal cancer:the Basingstoke experience of total mesoreetal excision,1978-1997.Arch Surg,1998,133(8):894-899.
  • 4Salerno G,Daniels IR,Moran BJ,et al.Clarifying margins in the muhidisciplinary management of rectal cancer:the MERCURY experience.Clin Radiol,2006,61 (11):916-923.
  • 5Brown G,Daniels IR.Preoperative staging of rectal cancer:the MERCURY research project.Recent Results Cancer Res,2005,165:58-74.
  • 6Bernstein TE,Endreseth BH,Romundstad P,et al.Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor in rectal cancer.Br J Surg,2009,96(11):1348-1357.
  • 7Nagtegaal ID,Marijnen CA,Kranenbarg EK,et al.Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma:not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit.Am J Surg Pathol,2002,26(3):350-357.
  • 8Adam IJ,Mohamdee MO,Martin IG,et al.Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer.Lancet,1994,344(8924):707-711.
  • 9Nagtegaal ID,Quirke P.What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oneol,2008,26(2):303-312.
  • 10Wibe A,Rendedal PR,Svensson E,et al.Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.Br J Surg,2002,89(3):327-334.

共引文献15

同被引文献39

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部