巴德高压球囊与普通外周球囊治疗前臂自体动静脉瘘狭窄的效果比较

Bard high-pressure balloon versus common peripheral balloon for autologous forearm arteriovenous fistula stenosis

目的比较巴德高压球囊与普通外周球囊治疗前臂自体动静脉瘘狭窄的疗效。方法40例前臂自体人工动静脉瘘狭窄患者分别采用巴德高压球囊或普通外周球囊治疗,比较两组疗效及球囊对内瘘狭窄治疗的通畅率。结果巴德高压球囊组的球囊扩张压力和手术成功率均明显高于普通球囊组,球囊扩张次数则少于普通球囊组(P<0.01或0.05)。术后6个月巴德高压球囊组通畅率显著高于普通球囊组(P<0.05)。结论巴德高压球囊提高了前臂自体人工动静脉瘘狭窄患者的手术成功率和长期通畅率。

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of Bard high-pressure balloon and common peripheral balloon for treating autogenous forearm arteriovenous fistula stenosis(AVFS).Methods Forty cases of autologous forearm AVFS were treated with high-pressure or common peripheral balloon.The clinical efficacy and balloon patency were compared between two groups.Results Compared with common peripheral balloon group,balloon dilatation pressure,success rate,and 6-month balloon patency were higher,while number of balloon dilation was lower in high-pressure balloon group(P<0.01 or 0.05).Conclusion Bard high-pressure balloon can significantly improve the success rate and long-term patency rate in patients with autologous forearm AVFS.