对产褥期产妇实施延续性护理的效果评价

Evaluation of the Effect Continuous Nursing for Puerperal Women

目的观察对产褥期产妇实施延续性护理的效果,探讨临床价值。方法 2017年1月至2017年12月我院产科病房收治316例孕产妇随机分常规护理及延续护理组各158例,两组产妇均接受围生期健康宣教和指导,延续护理组实施延续性护理。结果两组出院时SDS(47.46±5.22)vs(46.82±4.98)、ESCA(87.23±7.34)vs(88.06±8.02)无差异(P> 0.05);延续护理组产后42 d SDS平均(42.28±3.28)、产褥期并发症发生率6.33%低于常规护理组的(48.34±5.05)、18.35%(t=3.15,χ~2=5.22,P <0.05);ESCA评分平均(124.39±12.94)、母乳喂养率93.03%、护理满意98.73%高于常规护理组(103.29±10.78)、75.95%、91.14(t=4.22,χ~2=8.47,χ~2=4.02,P <0.05)。结论对产褥期的产妇实施产后延续性护理,能够起到重要积极作用,对产妇及婴儿的身体恢复,优于常规护理的传统模式,值得应用。

Objective To observe the effect of continuous nursing on puerperal women and explore its clinical value. Method From January 2017 to December 2017, 316 pregnant and lying-in women were randomly divided into routine nursing group and continuing nursing group, 158 cases in each group. Both groups received perinatal health education and guidance, and continuing nursing group implemented continuing nursing. Result In both groups SDS(47.46±5.22) vs(46.82±4.98), ESCA(87.23±7.34) vs(88.06 ±8.02) showed no difference. the continuing nursing group 42 days after delivery SDS(42.28±3.28). puerperal complications 6.33% were lower than those in routine nursing group(48.34 ±5.05), 18.35%(t=3.15, χ~2=5.22, P<0.05). ESCA score(124.39±12.94). Breastfeeding 93.03%. The nursing satisfaction rate 98.73% were higher than that of routine nursing group(103.29±10.78), 75.95% and 91.14%(t= 4.22, χ~2=8.47, χ~2=4.02, P<0.05). Conclusion Continuous nursing makes up for the deficiency of traditional nursing, enables nurses to master the situation of puerperal rehabilitation in time, and the puerpera can get professional guidance in time, so as to promote rapid physical and mental recovery.