期刊文献+

How do Cats Resist Landing Injury:Insights into the Multi-level Buffering Mechanism 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
摘要 When humans jump down from a high position,there is a risk of serious injury to the lower limbs.However,cats can jump down from the same heights without any injury because of their excellent ability to attenuate impact forces.The present study aims to investigate the macro/micro biomechanical features of paw pads and limb bones of cats,and the coordination control of joints during landing,providing insights into how cats protect themselves from landing injury.Accordingly,histological analysis,radiological analysis,finite element method,and mechanical testing were performed to investigate the mechanical properties,microstructure,and biomechanical response of the pads and limb bones.In addition,using a motion capture system,the kinematic/kinetic data during landing were analysed based on inverse dynamics.The results show that the pads and limb bones are major contributors to non-impact-injuries,and cats actively couple their joints to adjust the parameters of movement to dissipate the higher impact.Therefore,the paw pads,limb bones,and coordinated joints complement each other and constitute a multi-level buffering mechanism,providing the cat with the sophisticated shock absorption system.This biomechanical analysis can accordingly provide biological inspiration for new approaches to prevent human lower limb injuries.
出处 《Journal of Bionic Engineering》 SCIE EI CSCD 2020年第3期600-610,共11页 仿生工程学报(英文版)
基金 The work is financially supported by the Defense Industrial Technology Development Program under the Grant JCKY2018601B106 and JCKY2017205B032.
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献54

  • 1Darwin C. The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. 6th ed. London: Senate, 1872.
  • 2Spring L W. Climbing and pecking adaptations in some north american woodpecker. Condor, 1965, 67:457-488.
  • 3May P R, Fuster J M, Haber J, et al. Woodpecker drilling behavior-- an endorsement of the rotational theory of impact brain injury. Arch Neurol, 1979, 36:370--373.
  • 4Bock W J. Functional and evolutionary morphology of woodpecker. Ostrich, 1999, 70:23-31.
  • 5Gibson L J. Woodpecker pecking: how woodpeckers avoid brain injury. J Zool, 2006, 270:462-465.
  • 6Oda J, Sakamoto J, Sakano K. Mechanical evaluation of the skeletal structure and tissue of the woodpecker and its shock absorbing system. JSME Int J Ser A, 2006, 49:390-396.
  • 7Bock W J. An approach to the funcitional analysis of bill shape. Auk, 1966, 83:10-51.
  • 8Herrel A, Podos J, Huber S K, et al. Evolution of bite force in Darwin's finches: a key role for head width. J Evol Biol, 2005, 18: 669-675.
  • 9Degrange F J, Tambussi C P, Moreno K, et al. Mechanical analysis of feeding behavior in the extinct "terror bird" Andalgalornis steulleti (Gruiformes: Phorusrhacidae). PLoS ONE, 2010, 5:e11856.
  • 10May P R, Fuster J M, Newman P, et al. Woodpeckers and head injury. Lancet, 1976, 1:454-455.

共引文献16

同被引文献8

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部