期刊文献+

基于项目类别的多级评分方式比较及探究

Comparison and Exploration of Multi-level Scoring Methods Based on Item Category
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在认知诊断中,不同评分方式对学生知识状态的估计有重要的影响。现有基于项目类别的多级评分方式只被应用于参数方法中,且只按步骤顺序对学生进行评分,未考虑在非参数方法中的应用及按步骤非顺序评分情景。文章通过比较参数方法与非参数方法在基于项目类别Q矩阵下的判准率情况,发现其在非参数方法中同样适用,并在现有评分方式基础上提出一种按步骤非顺序的评分方式,通过模拟研究发现这种.评分方式在不同条件下均优于原有评分方式。 In cognitive diagnosis,different scoring methods have important impacts on the estimation of students’knowledge status.The existing multi-level scoring method based on item category is only applied to the parameter method,and the students are only scored in the order of steps,the application in the non-parametric method and the non-sequential scoring in steps are not considered.This paper compares the parameter method and the non-parametric method based on the criterion rate of a category-level Q-matrix,and finds that it is also applicable in the non-parametric method.Based on the existing scoring method,a step-by-step but non-order scoring method is proposed,and through simulation studies it is found that this scoring method is superior to the original scoring method under different conditions.
作者 朱仕浩 康春花 洪清玉 Zhu Shihao;Kang Chunhua;Hong Qingyu(Zhejiang Normal University,Jinhua Zhejiang,321004)
机构地区 浙江师范大学
出处 《考试研究》 2020年第3期38-46,共9页 Examinations Research
关键词 认知诊断 项目类别 非参数方法 非顺序评分 Cognitive Diagnosis Project Category Non-parametric Methods Nonsequential Scoring
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献64

  • 1戴海崎,张青华.规则空间模型在描述统计学习模式识别中的应用研究[J].心理科学,2004,27(4):949-951. 被引量:39
  • 2曹亦薇.异常反应模式的识别和分类[J].心理学报,2001,33(6):558-563. 被引量:9
  • 3余嘉元.运用规则空间模型识别解题中的认知错误[J].心理学报,1995,27(2):196-203. 被引量:40
  • 4Bolt D, Fu J. B. (2004). A polytomous extension of the fusion model and its Bayesian parameter estimation. Paper presented at NCME, San Diego, USA.
  • 5Cui Y., Leighton J. P. & Zheng Y.G. (2006). Simulation studies for evaluating the performance of the two classification methods in the AHM. Paper presented at NCME, San Francisco, CA.
  • 6Gierl M. J., Leighton J. P. & Hunka S. M. (2000). Exploring the logic of Tatsuoka’s rule-space model for test development and analysis. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice,19, 34 -44.
  • 7Leighton J. P., Gierl M. J., & Hunka S. M. (2004). The attribute hierarchy method for cognitive assessment: a variation on Tatsuoka’s rule space approach. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41(3), 205-237.
  • 8Qi S. Q., Dai H. Q. & Ding S. L. (2004). Comparing ANOTE with MULTILOG and PARSCALE on parameter estimation. Paper presented at NCME, San Diego, USA.
  • 9Samejima F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph, No. 17.
  • 10Tatsuoka K. K. (1983). Rule space: an approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20(4), 345-354.

共引文献103

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部