《X、γ射线立体定向放射治疗系统质量控制检测规范》(WS 582—2017)追踪评价结果分析

Analysis of "Specifications for testing of quality control in X and γ ray stereotactic radiotherapy system"(WS 582—2017) tracking evaluation results

目的了解《X、γ射线立体定向放射治疗系统质量控制检测规范》(WS 582—2017)使用过程中遇到的问题,对标准的科学性、合理性、适用性及可操作性等方面进行评价,为进一步完善该标准提出合理化建议。方法采用问卷和现场调查相结合的方式对标准进行追踪评价,对回收的调查表进行审核并补正标号,采用Excel办公软件录入数据,用SPSS 13.0进行统计分析。结果使用标准单位均知晓标准的发布。技术服务机构和生产厂家培训率为71.9%和85.7%,监督机构和医疗机构分别为33.3%和43.5%。技术服务机构和生产厂家对标准内容熟悉率为71.7%、68.1%,监督机构和医疗机构对标准内容熟悉率为18.5%、54.8%。调查对象均对标准X刀章节掌握不够。超过一半的调查对象认为标准检测方法可操作性、实用性一般。结论使用人员对标准的协调性认可度较高,对标准的实用性和检测方法的可操作性认可度一般,宣传、培训力度有待提高,部分检测指标及方法需要实例及说明。

Objective To understand the problems in the use of the standard named specifications for testing of quality control in X and γ ray stereotactic radiotherapy system(WS 582—2017), and evaluate the scientificity, rationality, applicability and operability of the standard, so as to put forward reasonable suggestions for further improving. Methods According to WS/T 536—2017, the standard was tracked and evaluated by questionnaire and field survey, and then the recovered questionnaire were reviewed and the label was corrected, At last the data was input by Excel office and the statistical analysis was carried out by SPSS 13.0. Results All units using the standard were aware of the release of the standard. The training rate of technical service institutions、manufacturers、supervision institutions and medical institutions were 71.9%、85.7%、33.3%and 43.5%, respectively. The familiarity rate of technical service institutions、manufacturers、supervision institutions and medical institutions with the standard content were 71.7%、 68.1%、 18.5% and 54.8%, respectively. Meanwhile, all the respondents did not grasp the chapter of X-knife, and more than half of the respondents thought that the standard test methods were feasible and practical. Conclusion The users had a high degree of recognition for the coordination of standards;The practicability of the standard and the operability of the detection method were generally recognized. Meanwhile, In the future the publicity and training efforts need to be improved, and some testing indexes and methods need examples and explanation.