期刊文献+

考虑跨渠道退货的双渠道闭环供应链决策研究 被引量:13

Decision Making of Double Channel Closed Loop Supply Chain Considering Cross-channel Returns
原文传递
导出
摘要 双渠道闭环供应链存在制造商网络直销渠道和零售商实体店零售渠道。消费者会对购买不满意的产品进行退货,由于网上商店购买的产品缺乏现场体验故退货率较高。相比线下实体商店,线上退货流程更为复杂,这往往容易影响消费者购物体验。因此本文设计考虑跨渠道退货的双渠道闭环供应链结构,并分析跨渠道退货率以及渠道消费偏好对供应链的决策影响,基于Stackelberg博弈和Nash均衡博弈理论,从集中式决策与分散式决策两方面研究不同闭环供应链结构下的定价决策与利润分配,并结合数值算例进行分析。研究结果表明,跨渠道退货率以及消费者渠道偏好对闭环供应链的定价策略以及利润分配等决策具有显著影响。 In the double channel supply chain,there are manufacturers’direct sales channels in online stores and retailers’channels in physical stores.The consumer will return the goods that are not satisfied with the purchase.Because the products purchased by the online store lack the on-site experience,the return rate is high,but the return of the online channel is more complex than the return of the offline channel,which will affect the consumer shopping experience.Therefore,a closed-loop supply chain structure is constructed based on a single manufacturer’s online store and a single retailer’s physical offline store,and three return channels including cross-channel return are designed.Considering the impact of cross-channel return rate and consumer preference in the closed-loop supply chain,differential pricing is made.Two kinds of centralized decision-making(differential pricing strategy and unified pricing strategy)and three kinds of decentralized decision-making(manufacturer-dominated Stackelberg game,retailer-dominated Stackelberg game and Nash equilibrium game)are adopted to analyze the pricing decision and profit distribution of closed-loop system,and the conclusions are verified by numerical examples.The result shows that cross-channel return rate and consumer channel preference have direct impact on pricing strategies and profit allocation of closed loop supply chain.Under centralized decision-making,the price competition in two different channels is relatively weak,so the channel preference of consumers has little influence on the pricing decision of the two channels.In decentralized decision-making,the optimal price of two competitive channels is greatly influenced by the preference of customers for the channel.This paper can enrich and perfect the relevant theories of double channel supply chain and cross-channel returns,and provide series of useful guidance for the decisions of manufacturers and retailers.
作者 潘文军 缪林 PAN Wen-jun;MIAO Lin(Business School of HuaQiao University,Quanzhou 362021,China)
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2020年第6期112-122,共11页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目(14BGL008)。
关键词 跨渠道退货 双渠道 集中式决策 分散式决策 博弈 cross-channel returns double channel centralized decision decentralized decision making game theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献121

  • 1顾巧论,高铁杠,石连栓.基于博弈论的逆向供应链定价策略分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(3):20-25. 被引量:208
  • 2陈荣.预期后悔与体验后悔在消费者动态选择过程中的作用机制[J].南开管理评论,2007,10(3):29-34. 被引量:19
  • 3Hess, J. D., Chu, W., Gerstner, E.. Controlling Product Returns in Direct Marketing. Marketing Letters, 1996, 7(4): 307-317.
  • 4Wood, S. L.. Remote Purchase Environments: The Influence of Return Policy Leniency on Two-stage Decision Processes. Journal of Marketing Research, 2001, 38(2): i57-169.
  • 5Dowling, G. R., Staelin, R.. A Model of Perceived Risk and In- tended Risk-handling Activity. Journal of Consumer Research, 1994, 21(1): 119-134.
  • 6Hetts, J. J., Boninger, D. S., Armor, D. A., Gleicher, F., Nathan- son, A.. The Influence of Anticipated Counterfactual Regret on Behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 2000, 17(4): 345-368.
  • 7Ketzenberg, M. E., Zuidwijk, R. A.. Optimal Pricing, Ordering, and Return Policies for Consumer Goods. Production and Op- eration Management, 2009, 18(3): 344-360.
  • 8Petersen, J. A., Kumar, V.. Are Product Returns a Necessary Evil? Antecedents and Consequences. Journal of Marketing, 2009, 73(3): 35-51.
  • 9Bechwati, N. N., Siegal, W. S.. The Impact of the Prechoice Process on Product Return. Journal of Marketing Research, 2005, 42(3): 358-367.
  • 10Janakiraman, N., Ord6fiez, L.. Effect of Effort and Deadlines on Consumer Product Returns. Journal of Consumer Psycholo- gy, 2012, 22(2): 260-271.

共引文献341

同被引文献82

引证文献13

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部