期刊文献+

腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术联合心理干预对局限性前列腺癌患者预后影响 被引量:9

Effect of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy combined with psychotherapy intervention on the prognosis of localized prostate cancer patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术联合心理干预对局限性前列腺癌患者预后的影响。方法选取2017年1月~2019年1月期间我院收治的局限性前列腺癌患者60例作为本次研究的对象,按随机数字表法将研究对象随机分为观察组和对照组,每组各30例。对照组患者给予腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术治疗,观察组在对照组的基础上联合心理干预。观察比较两组患者干预前后的SAD、SDS、IPSS,手术情况、住院时间及干预后SF-36评分和护理满意度。结果(1)干预前,两组患者的SAS、SDS、IPSS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),与干预前相比,两组患者干预后的SAS、SDS、IPSS评分明显降低,且观察组患者评分明显低于对照组(P<0.05);(2)与对照组相比,观察组的患者干预后的生活质量明显改善(P<0.05);(3)干预后,观察组患者对护理满意度明显高于对照组(P<0.05);(4)两组患者住院时间及手术情况差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术联合心理干预治疗局限性前列腺癌患者,能够改善其负面情绪,提高生活质量,使患者预后良好。 Objective To investigate the effect of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy combined with psychotherapy intervention on the prognosis of localized prostate cancer patients.Methods A total of 60 patients with localized prostate cancer in our hospital from January 2017 to January 2019 were collected and randomly divided into two groups:control group(30 cases)was treated with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy;observation group(30 cases)combined psychological intervention on the basis of the control group.Self-rating anxiety scale(SAS),Self-rating Depressive Scale(SDS),International prostate symptom score(IPSS)before and after intervention,SF-36 score and nursing satisfaction after intervention and surgical status,length of stay between the two groups were compared.Results(1)Before intervention,there was no difference in SAS,SDS,IPSS score between the two groups(P>0.05).Compared with before intervention,the SAS,SDS,IPSS scores in the two groups were lower after intervention(P<0.05),and the scores in the observation group was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).(2)Compared with the control group,the quality life in the observation group significantly improved after the intervention(P<0.05).(3)After intervention,the nursing satisfaction in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05)(.4)there was no difference in hospital stays and operation situation between the two groups(P<0.05).Conclusion Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy combined with psychological intervention in the treatment of localized prostate cancer patients can alleviate their negative emotions,improve the quality of life,and improve the prognosis of patients.
作者 陈璐 倪婷 张莹 CHEN Lu;NI Ting;ZHANG Ying(Zhengzhou First People's Hospital in Henan Province,Zhengzhou 450000,China)
出处 《国际精神病学杂志》 2020年第3期602-605,共4页 Journal Of International Psychiatry
关键词 局限性前列腺癌 心理干预 腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术 Localized prostate cancer Psychological intervention Laparoscopic
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献91

  • 1李灿,辛玲.调查问卷的信度与效度的评价方法研究[J].中国卫生统计,2008,25(5):541-544. 被引量:474
  • 2吴训,于德新,谢栋栋,王毅.腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术与开放术式的疗效比较Meta分析[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2012,6(16):4773-4779. 被引量:19
  • 3王忠棠,周志耀,鲁德生,吴幸辰,杨立.晚期前列腺癌致后尿道梗阻的治疗(附10例报告)[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,1996,11(2):75-77. 被引量:26
  • 4Mansfield JT, Stephenson RA. Does transurethral resection of prostate compromise the radical treatment of prostate cancer. Semin Urol Oncol, 1996, 14(1):174.
  • 5马腾骧.现代泌尿外科学[M]天津:天津科学技术出版社,2000(1):864.
  • 6汪向东.心理卫生评定量表手册[J]中国心理卫生杂志,1993(增刊):223.
  • 7郭应禄;胡礼泉.男科学[M]北京:人民卫生出版社,20041154-1156.
  • 8CENTER MM, JEMAL A, LORTET-TIEULENT J, et al. International variation in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates[J]. Eur Urol, 2012, 61(6):1079-1092.
  • 9DALLERA MA, ALBERTSEN PC, BANGMA, C, et al. Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature[J]. Eur Urol, 2012, 62(6): 976-983.
  • 10ELDEFRAWY A, KATKOORI D, ABRAMOWITZ M, et al. Active surveillance vs. treatment for low-risk prostate cancer: a cost comparison[J]. Urol Oncol, 2013, 31(5): 576-580.

共引文献43

同被引文献110

引证文献9

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部