教唆行为标准的规范化判断及展开

Standardizing Judgment and Development of Instigation Behavior Standards

由于教唆行为本身难以类型化,故需要为教唆行为的认定提供一个相对明确的标准。教唆犯的成立应当首先符合教唆行为本身的行为构造,同时也需要被教唆者实行了侵害法益的客观行为。教唆行为的认定作为一种规范化的判断,对教唆的内容应当建立在社会经验的理解之上并结合特定的客观因素进行具体的考察。对片面教唆的概念应保持谨慎的态度,在设定片面教唆处罚界限上应采取实质的判断并充分注意片面教唆与片面帮助的区别。要成立违法且有责的教唆犯,还需要教唆者具备责任要素——教唆故意。学界并不承认过失的教唆,故过失的教唆者应与被教唆者按照共同正犯进行处罚。教唆故意的明确性应该从实行行为类型与不法程度两个方面进行展开。

Instigating behaviors are difficult to type,so requires a relatively clear identification standard.An abettor should conform to its behavioral structure,and the instigated person committed an objective act infringing on legal benefits.The identification of instigation behavior is a standardized judgment,and its content should be specifically investigated based on social experience and objective factors.The concept of one-sided instigation should be cautious,the punishment limits for one-sided instigation should be substantively judged,with particular attention to the difference between one-sided instigation and one-sided help.To establish an abettor who violates the law and assumes responsibility,the abettor must have the responsibility element-intention of instigation.The academia does not recognize negligent instigation,and the punishment standards are the same as those instigated.Intention of instigation should be clearly determined from the type of conduct and the degree of wrongfulness.