期刊文献+

计划靶体积概念是否适合肺癌质子调强治疗计划

Planning target volume-Is it still suitable for intensity modulated proton therapy for lung cancer?
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的基于计划靶体积(PTV)和内靶体积(ITV)概念计划差异,论述PTV概念不适合于肺癌质子调强治疗(IMPT)计划,为临床提供参考。方法基于上海质子治疗示范装置固定束模型和商业化治疗计划系统软件,对6例肺癌患者在平均CT图像上分别制作基于PTV的常规IMPT计划(PTV-IMPT)和基于ITV稳健的IMPT计划(ITV-IMPT)。所有计划均设置3个射束,采用蒙特卡罗剂量算法进行最终剂量计算。评估PTV-IMPT和ITV-IMPT计划的计划质量和稳健性能。结果ITV-IMPT、PTV-IMPT计划的ITV适形指数分别为0.58、0.43,均匀指数分别为0.96、0.92,双肺V5Gy(RBE)分别为13.1%、13.5%,脊髓Dmax分别为8.9、9.5 Gy(RBE),机器跳数分别为338、401 MU。在分别轻度扰动和重度扰动场景的7种状态下,ITV-IMPT、PTV-IMPT计划的靶区覆盖稳健性指数λ范围分别为0.003~0.032、0.02~0.28,双肺500 Gy(RBE)剂量体积指标ΔV5Gy范围分别为0.06~0.11、0.07~0.13。结论与PTV-IMPT比较,ITV-IMPT具有计划质量高、稳健性好的优势,具有重要的临床价值。因此,临床推荐使用ITV概念设计肺癌的质子调强计划。 Objective To demonstrate the concept of planning target volume(PTV)is not suitable for intensity proton therapy(IMPT)in lung cancer,plan differences were compared based on the concept of PTV and Internal target volume(ITV),aiming to provide clinical reference.Methods Six patients were retrospectively selected and approved by the local ethics committee.Each of the six patients received two IMPT plans based on a synchronous accelerator model,developed by SINAP team(Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics,China Academy Science University)and commercial treatment system:one with the PTV-based robust IMPT(PTV-IMPT)plan and the other with ITV-based robust IMPT(ITV-IMPT)plan.Three beams were set in all plans,and the final dose was calculated using Monte Carlo dose algorithm.The plan quality androbustnessof PTV-IMPT and ITV-IMPT plans were evaluatedquantitatively.Results Compared to the PTV-IMPT plan,ITV-IMPT plan showed better target conformity index(conformability index:0.58 vs.0.43),better homogeneity index(homogeneity index:0.96 vs.0.92),lower V5Gy innormal lung tissue(13.1%vs.13.5%)and maximum dose in spinal cord(8.9 Gy vs.9.5 Gy)as well as plan monitor unit(MU:338 vs.401).In addition,ITV-IMPT plan showed more robust in target coverage(0.003-0.032 vs.0.02-0.28),andnormal lung tissue was also found a bit robust in the ITV-IMPT plan(0.06-0.11,0.07-0.13).Conclusions Compared with the PTV-IMPT plan,ITV-IMPT plan has the advantages of high planning quality,well robustness and better tumor motion mitigation.Therefore,ITV concept is recommended to be applied in the IMPT plan for lung cancer.
作者 商海焦 蒲越虎 陈志凌 沈立人 贺晓东 黄晓延 王越男 Shang Haijiao;Pu Yuehu;Chen Zhiling;Shen Liren;He Xiaodong;Huang Xiaoyan;Wang Yuenan(Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Shanghai 201800,China;Department of Radiation oncology,Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to the Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200025,China;Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center,Cancer Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510060,China;Department of Radiation Oncology,National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital&Shenzhen Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College,Shenzhen 518116,China)
出处 《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2020年第7期540-545,共6页 Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
基金 中国科技部国家重点研发计划数字诊疗装备研发重点专项(2016YFC0105400) 深圳市医疗卫生三名工程项目资助(SZSM201812062)。
关键词 计划靶体积 内靶体积 质子调强治疗 稳健性 Planning target volume Internal target volume Intensity modulated proton therapy Robustness
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献15

  • 1Tobias C A, Lawrence J H, Born J L, et al. Pituitary irradiation with high-energy proton beams a preliminary report[J]. Cancer Research, 1958, 18(2): 121-134.
  • 2Loeffler J S, Durante M. Charged particle therapy- optimization, challenges and future directions[J]. Nature reviews Clinical oncology, 2013, 10(7): 411-424.
  • 3Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group[EB/Ok]. 2016-3-2. http://www.ptcog.chlindex.php/facilities-in-planning-stage.
  • 4P: droni E, Bacher R, Blattmann H, et al. The 200-MeV proton therapy project at the Paul Scherrer Institute: conceptual design and practical realization[J]. Medical Physics, 1995, 22(1): 37-53.
  • 5Kr~imer M, J~ikel O, Haberer T, et al. Treatment planning for heavy-ion radiotherapy: physical beam model and dose optimization[J]. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 2000, 45(11): 3299-3317.
  • 6Furukawa T, Inaniwa T, Sato S, et al. Performance of the NIRS fast scanning system for heavy-ion radiotherapy[J]. Medical Physics, 2010, 37(11): 5672-5682.
  • 7Gillin M T, Sahoo N, Bues M, et al. Commissioning of the discrete spot scanning proton beam delivery system at the university of Texas MD Anderson cancer center, proton therapy center, Houston[J]. Medical Physics, 2010, 37(1): 154-163.
  • 8Koehler A M, Schneider R J, Sisterson J M. Range modulators for protons and heavy ions[J]. Nuclear Instruments and Methods, 1975, 131(3): 437-440.
  • 9LIU Shiyao. The proton and heavy ions therapy and its facilities[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2012:274-276.
  • 10Chu W T, Ludewigt B A, Renner T R. Instrumentation for treatment of cancer using proton and light-ion beams[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 1993, 64(8): 2055-2122.

共引文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部