期刊文献+

TG100号报告在调强放疗流程质量控制中的应用研究 被引量:1

Application of TG100 report in process quality control of intensity-modulated radiotherapy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的依据TG100号报告提出的风险分析方法分析本中心调强放疗流程,改进质量控制方法,保证治疗安全和质量。方法基于TG100报告,成立风险分析小组。构建调强放疗总流程图以及各分支步骤;开展失效模式与影响分析方法,确定流程中所有潜在的差错模式;基于设定的评分标准评估该差错模式发生概率、被检查出的概率以及差错模式发生对临床产生影响的严重程度;计算每个差错模式优先值,并按优先值分值从高到低排序,取前20%范围为高危差错模式;对高危差错模式进行差错树分析,改进质量控制方法。结果调强放疗共有11个主步骤,41个支步骤,共发现180个差错模式。计算优先值范围为30~178,共36个高危差错模式。排在前5的高危差错模式优先值分别为摆位差错(178)、电子射野影像装置配准差错(172)、勾画错误(166)、计划执行差错(160)、既往剂量总结差错(156)。结论TG100号报告可操作性和实用性强,能够有效地系统化改进本中心调强放疗流程,为治疗提供安全和质量保证。 Objective To analyze the intensity-modulated radiotherapy(IMRT)process based on the TG100 report,aiming to improve the quality control method and guarantee the safety and quality of IMRT.Methods Based on the TG100 report,a risk analysis team was established.The flow chart of overall and each sub-step of IMRT was constructed.The failure mode and effect analysis method were adopted to determine all potential error modes in the process.The probability of of the error mode,the probability of being checked out and the severity of the effect of the error mode on the clinical bed were evaluated based on the pre-set scoring standard.The priority value of each error mode was calculated and ranked from high to low priority value.The top 20%is defined as the high-risk error mode,which was analyzed by error tree to improve the quality control method.Results IMRT consisted of 11 main steps and 41 sub-steps,and 180 failure modes were detected.The priority values were ranged from 30 to 178.A total of 36 high-risk failure modes were found.The top 5 high-risk failure modes(RPN)consisted of setup error(178),electronic portal imaging device(EPID)registration(172),contouring error(166),treatment delivery error(160)and prescription dose error(156).Conclusion TG100 report is practical and convenient to utilize,which can effectively and systematically improve IMRT process and provide safety and quality assurance of IMRT process.
作者 宋锐 张俊 沈九零 刘志勇 高雪芬 倪刚 陈静 Song Rui;Zhang Jun;Shen Jiuling;Liu Zhiyong;Gao Xuefen;Ni Gang;Chen Jing(Department of Radiation Oncology,First People's Hospital of Tianmen City,Tianmen 431700,China;Department of Radiation Chemotherapy,Zhongnan Hospital,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China)
出处 《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2020年第7期554-557,共4页 Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
关键词 肿瘤/调强放射疗法 失效模式 质量控制 Neoplasms/intensity-modulated radiotherapy Failure mode Quality control
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献23

  • 1许苹,许敏,刑茂迎,连斌,杨志平,罗旭.FMEA在医疗风险管理中的应用以及局限性[J].现代预防医学,2007,34(1):51-52. 被引量:70
  • 2殷蔚伯,余子豪,徐国镇,等.肿瘤放射治疗学[M].北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2007:149-150.
  • 3Joint Commission Resources, Inc. tklilnre mode and effkcts analysis in health care:proactiw risk reduction. Norwalk, CT. New York: Broad River Books,2005.
  • 4Sankar NR, Prabhu BS. Modi(ed approach lk," prioritizatiou of failures in a system failure mode and cffccls analysis. In| J Qual Reliabil Manag,2001,18 :324-336.
  • 5Merrick HW , Dobclbowcr RR Jr. lnlraopcratiw radiation therapy in surgical ontology, Surg Oncol CIin N Am,2003,12: 883 -897.
  • 6Gastmeier P, Sohr D, Breier A, et al. Prolonged duration of operation :an indicator of complicated surgery or of surgical (mis) management? Infection,201 1 ,39 :211-215.
  • 7World Health Organization. Radiothrapy risk pr.fih'. ,ncva: WHO, 2008.
  • 8Beddar AS, Biggs PJ, Chang S, et al. Intraoperalive radiaticm therapy using mobile electnm linear accelerators: reprt of A APM radiation therapy committee task group No. 72. Med Phys,2006, 33 : 1476-1489.
  • 9ICRU. Reports 62 ICRU Publication [ M ]. Bethesda : ICRU, 199 : 1097 - 1120.
  • 10翟医蕊,冯勤付,李明辉,陈辛元,王成锋,王淑莲,宋永文,于胜吉,王翔,宣立学,李晓光,白萍,高纪东,金晶,王维虎,刘跃平,吴铁城,李晔雄.腹部肿瘤术中电子线放疗安全性和急性副反应观察[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2010,19(5):448-451. 被引量:4

共引文献24

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部