摘要
美朝条约换文不久,朝鲜即向美国提出聘请顾问的要求,切盼首获军事顾问。美国驻朝外交代表从中发挥了推动作用,其中首任驻朝公使卢赛斯.福德和代理公使乔治.福久的表现尤为突出。然而,美国驻朝外交代表与美国政府之间的态度反差,实质是当时美国对朝“不介入”政策在该问题上的反映。尽管美国最终向朝鲜派出了军事顾问,但在该过程中美国官方的种种表现在相当大程度上预示了美朝之间的这种合作并不会有积极的成果。
After the ratification of US-Korean treaty,Korea requested to have American advisers,especially military advisers being in urgent need.American diplomats in East Asia played the key roles in pushing such despatch,among those were Lucius Foote,the first US minister to Korea,and George Foulk,the charge d’affaires to Korea,and the others.The attitude of the US government apparently went against that of those American diplomats.In effect,it was the reflection of the non-involvement policy of the US towards the Korean affairs,which appeared on the question of military advisers.Although the US dispatched military advisers in the end,its appearance showed a sign of failure to a large extent in such bilateral cooperation.
出处
《外国问题研究》
2020年第2期29-34,118,共7页
FOREIGN HISTORY STUDIES
基金
黑龙江省哲学社会科学规划项目“19世纪晚期至20世纪早期美国对朝政策研究”(编号:18SSB081)
黑龙江大学杰出青年基金项目“近代美朝关系研究”(编号:JC2016W6)。