期刊文献+

说谎者悖论解决方案之分类标准新探 被引量:1

On the Classification Standard of the Liar Paradox Solutions
原文传递
导出
摘要 在面对说谎者悖论的众多解决方案时,依据一些标准对其进行分门别类,有利于把握解悖方案的整体脉络。然而,随着对意义、有效性以及语篇的新认知等都被用来解决说谎者悖论,新近发展的一些解悖方案并不能被旧的分类标准很好地分类。新的分类标准应当能够将这些新的认知考虑进来,这一方面有助于进一步厘清悖论的性质,另一方面有助于寻求更为恰当的解悖方案。 When evaluating various solutions of the liar paradox,philosophers usually give some standards to classify which is helpful for them to grasp the whole skeleton of the paradox.However,as new insights of meaning,validity and discourse are gained and applied to solve paradox,some new solutions are not properly classified with old standards.When considering the classification standards of paradox,it is necessary to take these new insights into consideration.It helps clarifying properties of paradox and inspiring us to get better solutions to paradox.
作者 张亮 ZHANG Liang(School of Political Science and Public Administration,Soochow University,Suzhou 215000,China)
出处 《湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第4期31-38,共8页 Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目(18ZDA031) 江苏省高校哲学社会科学基金项目(BH10250619)。
关键词 说谎者悖论 分类标准 语篇 有效性 the liar paradox classification standard discourse validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献15

  • 1E. W. Adams, 1965, "A logic of conditionals", Inquiry, 8: 166-197.
  • 2E. W. Adams, 1975, The Logic of Conditionals, Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
  • 3S. Feferman, 1982, "Toward useful type-free theories, I", in R. L. Martin (ed.), Recent Essays on Truth and the Liar Paradox, pp. 237-287, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 4H. Field, 2008, Saving Truth from Paradox, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 5A. Gupta, 1982, "Truth and paradox", Journal of Philosophical Logic, 11: 1-60, re- printed in R. L. Martin (ed.), Recent Essays on Truth and the Liar Paradox, pp. 175- 235, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 6A. Gupta, 1993, The Revision Theory of Truth, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • 7A. Gupta, 2001, "Truth", in L. Goble (ed.), The Blackwell guide to Philosophical Logic, pp. 90-114, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • 8S. A. Kripke, 1975, "Outline of a theory of truth", Journal of Philosophical Logic, 17: 225-278, reprinted in R. L. Martin (ed.), Recent Essays on Truth and the Liar Paradox, pp. 53-81, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 9R. L. Martin and P. W. Woodruff, 1975, "On representing 'Truth-in-L' in L", Philosophia, 3:213-217, reprinted in R. L. Martin (ed.), Recent Essays on Truth and the Liar Para- dox, pp. 47-51, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 10R. Stalnaker, 1991, "A theory of conditionals", in F. Jackson (ed.), Conditional, Ox- ford: Oxford University Press.

共引文献1

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部