期刊文献+

认知-心理-社会支持干预对颅内肿瘤患者术后负性情绪、应对方式及生活质量的影响 被引量:12

Effect of cognitive-psychological-social support intervention on postoperative negative emotions,coping styles and quality of life in patients with intracranial tumor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨认知-心理-社会支持干预对颅内肿瘤患者术后负性情绪、应对方式及生活质量的影响。方法将158例颅内肿瘤患者依据术后干预方式不同分为观察组和对照组,每组79例。观察组采用认知-心理-社会支持方式进行干预,对照组采用常规方式进行干预。术后和术后4周,采用汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、应对方式量表(CSQ)、生活质量(QOL)量表评价两组患者负面情绪、应对方式和生活质量情况。结果术后4周两组患者HAMA、HAMD评分均降低,且观察组患者HAMA、HAMD评分均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后4周两组患者解决问题、求助、合理化评分均升高,自责、幻想、退避评分均降低,且观察组患者解决问题、求助、合理化评分均高于对照组,自责、幻想、退避评分均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后4周两组患者心理功能、躯体功能、生理功能、社会功能评分均升高,且观察组患者心理功能、躯体功能、生理功能、社会功能评分均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论认知-心理-社会支持干预对颅内肿瘤患者术后负性情绪、应对方式及生活质量有较好的影响,值得临床广泛应用。 Objective To explore the effects of cognitive-psychological-social support intervention on postoperative negative emotions,coping styles and quality of life in patients with intracranial tumors.Method A total of 158 patients with intracranial tumor were included and divided into study group and control group according to different postoperative interventions administered,and each group was allocated with 79 cases.The study group was managed with cognitive-psychological-social support,and the control group was given conventional interventions.The Hamilton anxiety rating scale(HAMA),Hamilton depression rating scale(HAMD),coping style scale(CSQ) and quality of life(QOL)scales were used to assess the postoperative negative emotions,coping styles and quality of life in the two groups.Result At 4 weeks after surgery,the HAMA and HAMD scores were decreased in both groups,and those in study group were significantly lower compared to control group(P<0.05).The problem solving,seeking help,rationalizing scores increased,while self-blame,illusion,and avoidance scores decreased in the two groups at 4 weeks post surgery,besides,the changes observed in study group were significantly greater compared to control group(P<0.05).The psychological,physical,physiological,and social functions were improved as evidenced by higher scores,with greater change from baseline noted in study group versus control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Cognitive-psychological-social support intervention exerts positive influences on the postoperative negative emotions,coping style and quality of life in patients with intracranial tumors,and it is worthy of clinical application.
作者 曹水英 郭玉青 高学军 晁素兰 CAO Shuiying;GUO Yuqing;GAO Xuejun;CHAO Sulan(Department of Encephalopathy,Beijing Chaoyang Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100043,China;Office,Beijing Chaoyang Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100043,China)
出处 《癌症进展》 2020年第13期1388-1391,共4页 Oncology Progress
关键词 颅内肿瘤 认知-心理-社会支持 负性情绪 应对方式 生活质量 intracranial tumor cognitive-psychological-social support negative emotion coping style quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献60

  • 1梁洪伟,单吉贤,徐惠绵.乳腺癌患者的心理康复及患肢康复[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2001,10(14). 被引量:3
  • 2石玉中,寇振芬,张利国,马长花.癌症患者的述情障碍[J].中国临床心理学杂志,1996,4(3):175-176. 被引量:23
  • 3姜乾金,沈晓红.医学应对问卷.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版)[M],北京:中国心理卫生杂志社.1999,124-127.
  • 4李惠春,黄丽.乳腺癌[A]//黄丽,罗健.肿瘤心理治疗[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2000:353-359,129-133.
  • 5HOLLAND JC, ROWLAND JH. Handbook of psycholo-oncology: psychological care of the patients with cancer[M]. New York, Oxford:Oxford University Press,1989:192-194.
  • 6LOVESTONE S, FAHY T. Psychological factors in breast cancer[J]. BMJ,1991, 302(6787): 1219-1220.
  • 7KATZ C, BOSCH G,HERZOG RE.Group-therapy of couples after breast cancer diagnosis: experimental pilot study[J]. Anticancer Res,1998, 18(3C): 2267-2269.
  • 8彭德清 王志刚 傅木昌.术后5年以上乳癌病人120例生存质量调查[J].现代康复,2001,5(1):132-132.
  • 9NORTHOUSE L. The impact of breast cancer on patients and husbands[J].Cancer Nursing,1989,12(5):276-284.
  • 10肖水源.社会支持评定量表.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,:127-127.

共引文献333

同被引文献154

引证文献12

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部