同质性的分裂与体验中认定的建模

Division in Consubstantial and Modeling of Identification in an Experience

麦克·利萨克在其文章中分析了设计思维与理解的诸多问题,以限制论展开的探讨显现出设计与认知科学等同的倾向,是简单化的现象学例证。然而交流与传达的全部,并非以某一组关系展开,其发生也不仅存在于人之间,还存在于理智、实践和情感之间并蕴含着更深层的关系。本文将对利萨克的理论进行分析,并试图拓展至杜威与伯克等人的分析之中,以获取对同质性认定的进一步理解。

Michael Lissack analyzes common issues of design thinking and understanding. However, a tendency to equate the design with cognitive science has aroused, a phenomenological example of simplifying. The whole of communication is not a defined group of relations, but a systematic ontological problem. Experience plays an essential role, and the modeling act of design needs to extend beyond such a drift. An inseparable influence between reason, practice, and emotion, and the occurrence of communication and understanding not only live in people but also contains deeper relationships. This article will analyze Lissack’s theory, effort to extend into Dewey and Burke gain a deep understanding of Consubstantial identification.