期刊文献+

DCE-MRI联合前哨淋巴结活检对腋窝淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗后状态转变的诊断价值 被引量:13

Diagnostic value of DCE-MRI combined with sentinel lymph node biopsy in axillary lymph node positive breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移(axillary lymph node metastasis,ALNM)患者新辅助化疗(neoadjuvant chemotherapy,NAC)后经动态增强磁共振(DCE-MRI)联合前哨淋巴结活检术(sentinel lymph node biopsy,SLNB)评估腋窝淋巴结(axillary lymph node,ALN)状态转变的诊断性能。方法收集132例在术前接受NAC治疗的乳腺癌患者。根据入选及排除标准最终纳入64例在初诊时经穿刺活检证实为腋窝淋巴结转移患者。依据腋窝淋巴结清扫术(axillary lymph node dissection,ALND)后病理结果将淋巴结状态分为阳性组及缓解组(包括孤立细胞转移及微转移),并以此为金标准,评估DCE-MRI、SLNB及两项联合诊断的敏感度、特异度、准确率及假阴性率。结果完整的NAC后,有21例(32.81%)患者在术后病理标本上显示为缓解(包括2例孤立细胞转移及1例微转移),余43例(67.19%)患者淋巴结仍保持阳性。DCE-MRI检查的敏感度为88.37%(38/43),特异度为76.19%(16/21),准确率为84.38%(54/64),假阴性率为11.63%(5/43);SLNB的敏感度为83.72%(36/43),特异度为100%(21/21),准确率为89.06%(57/64),假阴性率为16.28%(7/43);二者联合诊断的敏感度为93.02%(40/43),特异度为90.48%(19/21),准确率为92.19%(59/64),假阴性率为6.98%(3/43)。联合检查的敏感度及准确率高于单独检查,且假阴性率低,特异度则是SLNB最高。结论DCE-MRI检查及SLNB二者联合诊断对判定乳腺癌患者NAC后淋巴结状态的转变有更高的价值,可以为后续治疗、手术区域划定、评估预后等方面提供良好参考。
作者 陈相宏 董福仁 CHEN Xiang-hong;DONG Fu-ren
出处 《广东医学》 CAS 2020年第12期1280-1283,共4页 Guangdong Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献67

  • 1沈茜刚,周良平,彭卫军,张灵,毛健,岳磊,刘晓航.磁共振扩散加权成像在乳腺癌腋窝转移性淋巴结评价中的价值[J].肿瘤影像学,2013,22(1):45-48. 被引量:6
  • 2韩华,潘辅全.乳腺癌根治术与上肢淋巴水肿[J].海南医学,2005,16(9):124-125. 被引量:8
  • 3Chen JH, Feig BA, Hsiang DJ, et al. Impact of MRI evaluates neoad- juvant chemotherapy response on change of surgical recommenda- tion in breast cancer[J]. Ann Surg, 2009, 249(3):448-454.
  • 4Unteh M, Harbeck N, Huober J, et al. Primary therapy of patients with early breast cancer: evidence, controversies, consensus: opin- ions of german specialists to the 14th St. gallen international breast cancer conference 2015 (Vienna 2015)[J]. Geburtshilfe Frauen- heilkd, 2015, 75(6):556-565.
  • 5Galons JP, Altbach MI, Paine Murrieta GD, et al. Early increases in breast tumor xenograft water mobility in response to paclitaxel thera- py detected by noninvasive difusion magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Neoplasia(New York), 1999, 1 (2): 113-117.
  • 6Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evalua- tion criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J]. Eur J Cancer, 2009, 45(2):228-247.
  • 7He N, Xie C, Wei W, et al. A new, preoperative, MRI-based scor- ing system for diagnosing malignant axillary lymph nodes in women evaluated for breast cancer[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2012, 81(10):2602- 2612.
  • 8Scaranelo AM, Eiada R, Jacks LM, et al. Accuracy of unenhanced MR imaging in the detection of axillary lymph node metastasis: study of reproducibility and reliability[J]. Radiology, 2012, 262(2): 425-434.
  • 9Rouzier R, Mathieu MC, Sideris L, et al. Breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy for large breast tumors[J]. Cancer, 2004, 101(5): 918-925.
  • 10Yeh E, Slanetz P, Kopans DB, et al. Prospective comparison of mam- mography, sonography, and MRI in patients undergoing neoadju- vant chemotherapy for palpable breast cancer[J]. Am J Roentgenol, 2005, 184(3): 868-877.

共引文献1294

同被引文献126

引证文献13

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部