期刊文献+

聚桂醇联合清宫术治疗子宫瘢痕妊娠疗效评价 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评估超声引导下聚桂醇注射硬化治疗联合清宫术治疗瘢痕妊娠的疗效.方法回顾性分析2018年2月至2019年6月60例剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者的临床资料.其中30例患者在聚桂醇硬化治疗后行清宫术为观察组.30例患者在子宫动脉栓塞术后行清宫术为对照组.结果两组患者疗效比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).两组患者不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).聚桂醇组住院费用少于子宫动脉栓塞组(P<0.05).聚桂醇组住院时间明显比子宫动脉栓塞组短(P<0.05).结论超声引导下聚桂醇注射硬化治疗联合清宫术是治疗子宫瘢痕妊娠的有效方法.聚桂醇治疗操作简便,微创,副反应少,价格低廉,易被患者接受,更易于在基层医院开展. Objective To evaluate the efficacy of ultrasoimd-guided lauromacrogol injection sclerosing therapy combined with curettage on cesarean scar pregnancy(CSP).Methods From February 2018 to June 2019,60 patients with CSP received therapy in Hangzhou First people*s Hospital,including 30 patients underwent curettage after ultrasound-guided lauromacrogol injection in observation group and 30 patients undergoing curettage after uterine artery embolization in control group.Results There was no significant difference about effective rate between two groups(P>0.05).The difference in the adverse reacrion rate was not significant between two groups(P>0.05).The cost of the observation group was significant less than that of the control group(P<0.05).The hospitalization time of the observation group was significant shorter than that of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Ultrasound-guided lauromacrogol injection sclerosing therapy combined with curettage is effective for cesarean scar pregnancy,and it has the advantages of easy operation,mild trauma,few complications,low cost and high patient satisfaction.It is worthy of promotion in primary hospitals.
出处 《浙江临床医学》 2020年第7期987-988,共2页 Zhejiang Clinical Medical Journal
关键词 子宫瘢痕妊娠 聚桂醇注射液 清宫术 子宫动脉栓塞 Cesarean scar pregnancy Lauromacrogol injection Curettage Uterine artery embolization
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献20

  • 1Jacquemyn Y, Kerremans M, de Beeck BO, et al.Caesarean scar pregnancy. BMJ Case Rep 2012; 9; 2012.
  • 2Zhang Y, Gu Y, Wang JM, et al. Analysis of cases withcesarean scar pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2013;39:195-202.
  • 3Sadeghi H, Rutherford T, Rackow BW, et al. Cesareanscar ectopic pregnancy: case series and review of theliterature. Am J Perinatol 2010; 27:111-20.
  • 4Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesarean scar ectopicpregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management.Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107:1373-81.
  • 5Yang XY, Yu H, Li KM, et al. Uterine artery embolizationcombined with local methotrexate for treatment ofcesarean scar pregnancy. BJOG 2010; 117:990-6.
  • 6Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ. Births: final data for2007. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2009; 57:1-85.
  • 7Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A. Unforeseen consequencesof the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries:early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. Areview. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207:14-29.
  • 8Wu R, Klein MA, Mahboob S, et al. Magnetic resonanceimaging as an adjunct to ultrasound in evaluating cesareanscar ectopic pregnancy. J Clin Imaging Sci 2013; 3:16.
  • 9Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Santos R, et al. Thediagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cesarean scarpregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207:44.e1-13.
  • 10Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, et al. First-trimesterdiagnosis and management of pregnancies implantedinto the lower uterine segment cesarean section scar.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21:220-7.

共引文献8

同被引文献13

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部