期刊文献+

左氧氟沙星与头孢呋辛治疗肺炎的药物经济学分析 被引量:1

Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Levofloxacin and Cefuroxime in the Treatment of Pneumonia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探究左氧氟沙星与头孢呋辛治疗肺炎的药物经济学分析。方法:按照随机数字排序将所选取的肺炎患者分组,左氧氟沙星组(LE组)和头孢呋辛组(CA组),每组150例。通过分析LE组和CA组患者治疗效果、继发效应、成本-效果差异性来探究左氧氟沙星与头孢呋辛治疗肺炎患者的药物经济学分析。结果:治疗后,两组患者治疗效果相比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,两组患者继发效应发生情况相比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在有效率相同的情况下,LE组患者每增加1%,所需治疗费用就增加(22.69±5.35)元,CA组需增加(26.23±4.83)元。结论:左氧氟沙星与头孢呋辛对肺炎患者均有一定的治疗效果,但前者治疗所需成本较低。 Objective:To explore the pharmacoeconomic analysis of Levofloxacin and Cefuroxime in the treatment of pneumonia.Method:The selected patients with pneumonia were sorted according to random numbers,Levofloxacin group(LE group)and Cefuroxime group(CA group),150 cases in each group.The pharmacoeconomic analysis of Levofloxacin and Cefuroxime in the treatment of patients with pneumonia was explored by analyzing the differences in treatment effects,secondary effects,and cost-effectiveness analysis of patients in the LE and CA groups.Result:After treatment,the effects of the two groups were not significantly different(P>0.05).After treatment,the incidence of secondary effects in the two groups were similar(P>0.05).With the same effective rate,for every 1%increase in the LE group,the required treatment cost increased by(22.69±5.35)yuan,CA group increased by(26.23±4.83)yuan.Conclusion:Both levofloxacin and cefuroxime have a certain therapeutic effect on patients with pneumonia,but the cost of the former is relatively low.
作者 陈桂香 朱碧媛 赵思婷 CHEN Guixiang;ZHU Biyuan;ZHAO Siting(Dongguan Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital,Dongguan 523000,China;不详)
机构地区 东莞市中医院
出处 《中外医学研究》 2020年第21期169-171,共3页 CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
关键词 左氧氟沙星 头孢呋辛 药物经济学 肺炎 Levofloxacin Cefuroxime Pharmacoeconomics Pneumonia
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献41

  • 1社区获得性肺炎诊断和治疗指南[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2006,29(10):651-655. 被引量:3041
  • 2Niederman MS, Mandell AL, Anzueto A. et al. Guidelines for the man- agement of adults with community-acquired pneumonia. Diagnosis, as- sessment of severity, antimicrobial therapy, and prevenflon [J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2001, 163(7): 1730-1754.
  • 3Karlowsky JA, Thornsberry C, Jones ME, et al. Factors associated with relative rates of antimicrobial resistance among Streptococcus pneu- moniae in the United States: results from the TRUST Surveillance Pro-gram (1998-2002) [J]. Clin Infeet Dis, 2003, 36(8): 963-970.
  • 4Johnson DM, Stilwell MG, Fritsche TR, et al. Emergence of multi- drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1999-2003) [J]. Diagn Microbiol In.feet Dis, 2005, 56(1): 59-74.
  • 5File TM Jr, Milkovich G, Tennenberg AM, et al. Clinical implications of 750 rag, 5 day levofloxacin for the treatment of community-ac- quired pneumonia [J]. Curt Med Res Opin, 2004, 20(9): 1473-1481.
  • 6Ball P. Efficacy and safety of levofloxacin in the context of other con- temporary fluoroquinolones: A review[J]. Current Therapeutic Re- search, 2003, 64(9): 646-656.
  • 7Pea F, Furlanut M. Levofloxacin PK/PD: from sequential therapy mod- el to high dosage for critical patients[J]. J Chemother, 2004, 16(suppl 2): 8-10.
  • 8陆权,陆敏.肺炎支原体感染的流行病学[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2007,22(4):241-243. 被引量:315
  • 9刘如.社区获得性肺炎的初始经验性抗菌治疗对策研究[J].中国全科医学,2008,11(15):1351-1352. 被引量:16
  • 10李燕明,缪竞智.抗菌药在社区获得性肺炎中的合理应用[J].中国全科医学,2008,11(16):1423-1425. 被引量:12

共引文献47

同被引文献13

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部