期刊文献+

伴囤积症状强迫症患者的临床特征研究 被引量:3

Clinical characteristics of the obsessive-compulsive disorder patients with hoarding symptoms
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的·探究伴囤积症状强迫症患者的临床特征,分析与囤积症状相关的危险因素。方法·共入组247例强迫症患者,137名健康对照。强迫症患者根据有无囤积症状被分为囤积组和非囤积组。采用耶鲁-布朗强迫症状量表、汉密尔顿抑郁量表、汉密尔顿焦虑量表、大五人格量表简化版以及强迫信念问卷测量3组被试的强迫症严重程度、抑郁及焦虑水平、人格特征、强迫信念等,比较组间差异,并应用Logistic回归分析囤积症状的相关因素。结果·不论是否伴有囤积症状,强迫症患者的抑郁水平、焦虑水平、神经质得分及强迫信念得分均显著高于健康对照(均P=0.000)。相比于非囤积组,囤积组的外向性水平显著降低(P=0.000),完美主义/确定性水平显著升高(P=0.037),在优柔寡断(P=0.003)、过度责任心(P=0.006)和病理性迟缓(P=0.000)方面的得分更高。Logistic回归模型中年龄(OR=0.94)、外向性得分(OR=0.89)和病理性迟缓得分(OR=2.50)具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论·强迫症患者伴有囤积症状的风险随着年龄的增长和外向性水平的提高而减小,随着病理性迟缓水平增加而增大。 Objective·To explore the clinical characteristics of the obsessive-compulsive disorder(OCD)patients with hoarding symptoms and analyze the risk factors related to hoarding symptoms.Methods·A total of 247 OCD patients and 137 healthy controls(HC)were enrolled.The OCD patients were divided into hoarding group and non-hoarding group according to hoarding symptoms.Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale,Hamilton Depression Scale,Hamilton Anxiety Scale,Neuroticism Extraversion Openness Five-Factor Inventory and Obsessive Belief Questionnaire-44 were used to measure the severity of OCD,levels of depression and anxiety,personality characteristics and obsessive-compulsive beliefs of the three groups.The differences among the groups were compared,and Logistic regression was used to analyze the related factors of hoarding symptoms.Results·Regardless of hoarding symptoms,the scores of depression,anxiety,neuroticism and obsessive beliefs in the patients with OCD were significantly higher than those in the healthy controls(all P=0.000).Compared with OCD/non-hoarding group,OCD/hoarding group had a significantly lower level of extroversion(P=0.000),a significantly higher level of perfectionism/certainty(P=0.037),and higher scores in indecisiveness(P=0.003),pathological responsibility(P=0.006)and pathological slowness(P=0.000).There was statistical significance in age(OR=0.94),extraversion score(OR=0.89)and pathological retardation score(OR=2.50)in Logistic regression model(all P<0.05).Conclusion·The risk of hoarding symptoms in the OCD patients decreases with the increase of age and extroversion level,and increases with the increase of pathological retardation level.
作者 吕娜 叶惠玲 范青 肖泽萍 Lü Na;YE Hui-ling;FAN Qing;XIAO Ze-ping(Shanghai Mental Health Center,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200030,China)
出处 《上海交通大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第6期791-797,共7页 Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University:Medical Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(81771460) 上海市科学技术委员会临床医学领域项目(18411952000) 上海市卫生和计划生育委员会科研课题计划(201740086)。
关键词 强迫症 囤积症状 临床特征 病理性迟缓 obsessive-compulsive disorder(OCD) hoarding symptom clinical characteristic pathological slowness
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献31

  • 1Costa PT, MeCrae RR. The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources,1985.
  • 2Costa PT, McCrae RR. The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI Manual suppiement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1989.
  • 3Costa PT, McCrae RR. NEO-PI-R professional manual. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PIR) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1992.
  • 4Holden RR, Fekken GC. The NEO five factor inventory in a Canadian context: Psychometric properties for a sample of university women. Personality and Individual Differences, 1994, 17:441-444.
  • 5Egan V, Deary I, Austin E. The NEO-FFI: Emerging British norms and an item-level analysis suggest N, A and Care more rehable than O and E. Personality and Individual Differences, 2000, 29:907-920.
  • 6Schmitz N, Hartkamp N, Baldini C, Rollnik J, Tress W. Psychometric properties of the German version of the NEO- FFI in psychosomatic outpatients. Personality and Individual Differences, 2001, 31:713-722.
  • 7Hrebickova M, Urbanek T, Cermak I, Szarota P, Fickova E, et al. The NEO five-factor inventory in Czech, Polish, and Slovak contexts. In McCrae RR Allik R. The Five-Factor Model of personality across cultures. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002:53-78.
  • 8McCrae RR, Costa PT. A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 2004, 36:587-596.
  • 9Costa PT, McCrae RR. The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI Manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1989.
  • 10Parker WD, Stumpf H. A validation of the five-factor model of personality in academically talented youth across observers and instruments. Personality and Individual Differences, 1998, 25:1005-1025.

共引文献258

同被引文献29

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部