期刊文献+

荧光PCR在百日咳病例实验室诊断中的应用 被引量:1

Application of real-time PCR in laboratory diagnosis of pertussis cases
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的为了解百日咳的真实感染状况,应用荧光PCR(Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction)对监测医院的百日咳疑似病例进行实验室诊断。方法2019年1~12月,在河南省4家监测医院采集百日咳疑似病例的鼻咽拭子,应用荧光PCR检测百日咳鲍特菌特异性核酸片段。结果对545例百日咳疑似病例开展荧光PCR检测,共检测出阳性病例94例,阳性率为17.25%。0岁组阳性率最高(41.82%),15~29岁组阳性率最低(2.38%),不同年龄组检测阳性率的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。男性和女性检测阳性率的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。发病14 d内疑似病例的检测阳性率最高,随着病程的延长阳性率逐渐下降。阳性病例的病程中位数(Median,M)=18 d,阴性病例的病程M=24 d,两组病例病程的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论6岁以内婴幼儿是百日咳高发群体,荧光PCR适用于发病14 d内的百日咳疑似病例的实验室诊断。 Objective In order to understand the true infection status of pertussis,real-time polymerase chain reaction(real-time PCR)was used for laboratory diagnosis of suspected cases of pertussis in monitoring hospitals.Methods From January to December in 2019,nasopharyngeal swabs from suspected cases of pertussis were collected at 4 monitoring hospitals in Henan Province.Realtime Polymerase Chain Reaction(real-time PCR)was used to detect DNA of Bordetella pertussis.Results 545 suspected cases of pertussis were detected by real-time PCR,of which 94 cases were positive,and the positive rate was 17.25%.<1 year-old group had the highest positive rate(41.82%),and 15-29 year-old group had the lowest positive rate(2.38%).The difference of positive rates in different age groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference of positive rates between male and female(P>0.05).Real-time PCR had the highest positive rate when the illness duration was less than 14 days.The difference of illness duration between positive cases and negative cases was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusions Children younger than 6 year-old had a higher incidence for pertussis than other age groups.Real-time PCR was suitable for laboratory diagnosis of suspected cases of pertussis whose illness duration was less than 14 days.
作者 刘倩 孔江南 李军 徐瑾 LIU Qian;KONG Jiangnan;LI Jun;XU Jin(Institute of EPI,Henan Prorincal Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Zhengzhou 450016,China)
出处 《河南预防医学杂志》 2020年第8期577-579,共3页 Henan Journal of Preventive Medicine
基金 河南省二〇一六年科技发展计划(豫科[2016]19号,162102310309)。
关键词 百日咳 荧光PCR 实验室诊断 Pertussis Polymerase chain reaction Laboratory diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献76

  • 1于燕,刁琳琪,申振元.河南省1963~2002年百日咳流行动态及控制策略分析[J].中国计划免疫,2005,11(5):402-404. 被引量:17
  • 2孟成艳,张文宏.全球百日咳疾病负担的现状与展望[J].中国计划免疫,2006,12(4):318-321. 被引量:24
  • 3de Melker HE, Schellekens JF, Neppelenbroek SE, et al. Reemergence of pertussis in the highly vaccinated population of the Netherlands: observations on surveillance data [J]. Emerg Infect Dis, 2000, 6 (4):348-357.
  • 4Celentano LP, Massari M, Paramatti D, et al. Resurgence of pertussis in Europe [J], Pediatr Infect Dis J, 2005, 24 (9):761-765.
  • 5CDC. Pertussis--Califomia, January-June 2010 [J]. MMWR, 2010, 59 (26): 817.
  • 6Center for Infectious Disease Research & Policy. More states report rising pertussis cases [EB/OL]http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/ content/other/news/aug0210portussis.html.
  • 7Roehr B. Whooping cough outbreak hits several US states [J]. BMJ, 2010, 341:c4627.
  • 8Strebel P, Nordin J, Edwards K, et al. Population-based incidence of pertussis among adolescents and adults, Minnesota, 1995-1996 [J]. J Infect Dis, 2001, 183 (9) :1353-1359.
  • 9Wright SW, Edwards KM, Decker MD, et al. Pertussis infection in adults with persistent cough [J]. JAMA, 1995, 273 (13): 1044- 1046.
  • 10Bisgard KM, Pascual EB, Ehresmann KR, et al. Infant pertussis: who was the source? [J]. Pediatr Infect Dis J, 2004, 23 ( 11 ) : 955- 989.

共引文献149

同被引文献27

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部