期刊文献+

科学计量学视域下跨学科学术评价方法研究进展 被引量:6

Research Progress of Interdisciplinary Academic Evaluation Methods from the Perspective of Scientometrics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对科学计量学视域下跨学科学术评价方法研究进展进行梳理与分析,有利于为构建科学合理的跨学科评价机制提供理论与方法上的参考,有助于推动学术评价研究的发展。通过文献法对各种以科学计量学为基础的跨学科学术评价方法进行梳理和总结分析。指出目前跨学科学术评价方法和指标已经从最初的单一化向复杂化、多元化过渡,逐渐纳入更多的因素,所以综合评价体系研究的重要性会越来越凸显。学科分类标准的制定也是一个值得研究的方向。以相对位置为依据的跨学科评价方法还需要考虑大学科和小学科之间存在的固有特点对评价结果产生的影响。此外,跨学科评价方法应该更加注重从整个科研过程的视角来开展评价,在定量方法上还有待更广泛的研究,同时相关科研数据的获取工具与途径也是一个重要的研究方向。 To review and analyze the research progress of interdisciplinary academic evaluation methods from the perspective of scientometrics is valuable for providing therietical and method reference for developing scientific and reasonable interdisciplinary academic evaluation systems and help to promote the development of academic evaluation research.Variety of interdisciplinary academic evaluation methods based on scientometrics were reviewed and analyzed through literature studies.The paper indicated that the interdisciplinary academic evaluation methods had changed to complicated and diversity from simplification and would subsumed much more factors,therefore the importance of comprehensive evaluation systems research would be more underlined.The research of displine classification standard is another valuable problem.The interdisciplinary academic evaluation methods based on relative positions need to study the influence of the characters come from the size of different disciplines.Moreover,the interdisciplinary academic evaluation methods should consider to evaluate from the whole researching progress as well as study the quantitative evaluations.And the tools and methods for achieving relative scientific data is also an important research area.
作者 张学梅 Zhang Xuemei
出处 《情报理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第7期171-178,共8页 Information Studies:Theory & Application
基金 江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学研究基金项目“高职院校图书馆科研数据服务研究”(项目编号:2018SJA1401) 苏州市职业大学高等教育研究项目专业竞争力提升专项“高职院校专业竞争力评价模型研究”(项目编号:Y2019LX065)的成果。
关键词 跨学科 科学计量学 学术评价 定量评价 interdisciplinary scientometrics academic evaluation quantitative evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献82

共引文献74

同被引文献107

引证文献6

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部