摘要
征收主要涉及三类问题:征收的正当性、征收的补偿、管制性征收的判断标准。财产权的功利主义理论、人格理论和多元价值理论从不同的角度为这些问题给出了解答,三者的答案既有一致的地方也有冲突之处。它们的分歧主要体现在征收的范围(是否任何类型的财产都可以被征收)、征收补偿的标准(是否所有征收都需要以市场价格补偿)以及管制性征收的判断标准上。三种财产权理论在征收制度中均有其适用空间,可以基于实用性考量在征收制度设计中调和它们各自的适用范围。
The issue of "Taking" involves three kinds of questions: the legitimacy of Taking;the compensation for Taking;and the criterion for judging the Regulative Taking. The personhood theory, utility theory and pluralistic value theory of property provide answers to these questions from different angles, and there are both consensus and difference in the claims of the three theories. The disagreements of the three theories mainly exist in: the scope of Taking, the criterion of compensation for Taking and the criterion for judging the Regulative Taking. According to the criterion of "practicality", the three theories have different role positioning in the institutions of Taking.
作者
王蕾
Wang Lei(Law School,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou 310018)
出处
《浙江社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第8期30-38,156,共10页
Zhejiang Social Sciences
基金
国家社科基金“基本权利与公共利益平衡的实践方法与制度路径研究”(16BFX083)的阶段性成果。
关键词
征收
财产权
功效
人格
多元论
taking
property
utility
personhood
pluralism
