期刊文献+

地方民族高校大学生“慕课+翻转课堂”混合式学习的质性研究 被引量:12

A Qualitative Study of Local Minority University Students’ Blended Learning in Form of “MOOC + Flipped Classroom”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,众多高校积极开展"慕课+翻转课堂"的混合式教学实践。学习者的混合学习行为成为研究热点。文章从学生视角出发,运用NVivo质性分析软件,以地方某民族高校14名学生为研究对象,分析了地方民族高校大学生混合式学习的行为类型和特征。研究显示,多数学生对新教学模式有较高接纳性,伴有功利型和内生型两种学习动机。高接纳性和多样的学习动机并不能支持学生保质保量完成线上和线下学习任务。学生的线上学习行为基于学习进度和学习质量可形成四种学习类型,线下学习行为可分为参与型和回避型。学生认为,自制力、主动参与学习、自学能力、交流合作能力是混合式学习者应具备的核心素养。 In recent years, many colleges and universities have actively carried out the blended teaching practice in the form of "MOOC + flipped classroom". The blended learning behavior of learners has become a research hotspot. From the perspective of students, this study uses Nvivo to analyze the behavior types and characteristics of blended learning among 14 students in a local minority university. The research shows that most students have a high acceptance of the new teaching mode, accompanied by two kinds of learning motivation: utilitarian and endogenous. High acceptance and diverse learning motivation can not support students to complete online and offline learning tasks with quality and quantity. Students’ online learning behavior can be divided into four types based on learning progress and learning quality. Offline learning behavior can be divided into participation and avoidance. Students think that self-control, active participation in learning, self-study ability, and the ability of communication and cooperation with others are the core qualities for blended learners.
作者 秦超 王昕 QIN Chao;WANG Xin(Yunnan Minzu University,Kunming 650500,China;The College of Arts and Sciences Yunnan Normal University,Kunming 650031,China)
出处 《黑龙江高教研究》 北大核心 2020年第7期150-154,共5页 Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究项目“慕课与翻转课堂:西南边疆省区高校课程创新的准备度及导入策略研究”(编号:17XJC880006)研究成果。
关键词 “慕课+翻转课堂” 混合式学习 学习行为 "MOOC+flipped classroom" blended learning learning behavior
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献140

  • 1刘大立,李锋亮.教育管制能够促进教育公平吗?——来自北京市的实证研究[J].教育学术月刊,2013(6):3-6. 被引量:3
  • 2何玲,黎加厚.促进学生深度学习[J].计算机教与学.现代教学,2005(5):29-30. 被引量:1365
  • 3克利福德·格尔兹.1999,《文化的解释》,纳日碧力戈等译,上海:上海人民出版社.
  • 4列维-斯特劳斯.1987,《野性的思维》,李幼蒸译,北京:商务印书馆.
  • 5Abbott, Andrew & Alexandra Hrycak 1990, “Measuring Resemblance in Sequence Data: An Optimal Matching Analysis of Musicians' Careers.” American Journal of Sociology 96(1).
  • 6Abell, Peter 1987, The Syntax of Social Life: The Theory and Method of Comparative Narratives. Oxford [Oxford,shim], New York: Clarendon Press.
  • 7Attride-Stirling, Jennifer 2001, “Thematic Networks: An Analytic Tool for Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Research 1(3).
  • 8Bal, Mieke & Bryan Gonzales 1999, The Practice of Cultural Analysis: Exposing Interdisciplinary Interpretation. Stanford, Calif. : Stanford University Press.
  • 9Barry, Christine A. 1998, “Choosing Qualitative Data Analysis Software: Atlas/Ti and NUDIST Compared.” Sociological Research Online 3(3).
  • 10Bauer, Martin W. & George Gaskell 2000, Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound: A Practical Handbook. London: SAGE.

共引文献868

同被引文献130

引证文献12

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部