期刊文献+

经腹膜外耻骨上机器人辅助腹腔镜单纯前列腺切除术15例 被引量:3

Extraperitoneal suprapubic robot-assisted laparoscopic simple prostatectomy:a report of 15 cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的总结经腹膜外耻骨上机器人辅助腹腔镜单纯前列腺切除术(RASP)治疗良性前列腺增生的手术经验,探讨该术式的疗效及安全性。方法回顾性分析2015年4月至2018年11月接受经腹膜外耻骨上RASP的15例良性前列腺增生患者资料,记录手术时间、术中出血量、术后膀胱冲洗时间、术后引流时间、术后导尿管留置时间、术后住院时间及并发症发生情况,比较术前与术后国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生命质量评分(QoL)、残余尿量(PVR)和最大尿流率(Qmax)的差异。结果15例手术均顺利完成。手术时间(控制台时间)为(92.0±28.3)min,术中出血量为(105.0±42.5)mL,没有患者需要输血治疗;术后膀胱冲洗时间为(2.2±0.5)d,术后引流时间为(1.8±0.6)d,术后导尿管留置时间为(5.7±1.2)d,术后住院时间为(4.1±1.3)d。术后3例发生Clavien-Dindo分级Ⅰ级并发症,1例发生Ⅱ级并发症。术后3个月随访,患者IPSS、QoL、PVR和Qmax均较术前改善(P均<0.01)。结论经腹膜外耻骨上RASP是一种安全有效的良性前列腺增生治疗方式。 Objective To summarize the surgical experience on extraperitoneal suprapubic robot-assisted laparoscopic simple prostatectomy(RASP)in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH),and to discuss the efficacy and safety of this procedure.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 15 patients with BPH undergoing extraperitoneal suprapubic RASP from Apr.2015 to Nov.2018.The operation time,estimated blood loss,postoperative bladder irrigation time,postoperative drainage time,postoperative catheterization time,postoperative hospital stay and complications were recorded.The postoperative international prostate symptom score(IPSS),quality of life(QoL),post-voiding residual volume(PVR)and maximal flow rate(Qmax)were compared with those before operation.Results The operation was successfully completed in all the 15 cases.The operation time(console time)averaged(92.0±28.3)min,estimated blood loss averaged(105.0±42.5)mL,and no patient needed blood transfusion.The postoperative bladder irrigation averaged(2.2±0.5)days,postoperative drainage averaged(1.8±0.6)days,postoperative catheterization averaged(5.7±1.2)days,and postoperative hospital stay averaged(4.1±1.3)days.Clavien-Dindo gradeⅠcomplications occurred in three cases,and gradeⅡcomplications occurred in one case.After 3 months of follow-up,the values of IPSS,QoL,PVR and Qmax were significantly improved in the patients(all P<0.01).Conclusion Extraperitoneal suprapubic RASP is a safe and effective surgical procedure for the treatment of BPH.
作者 王平 夏丹 孔德波 秦杰 景泰乐 叶孙益 朱意 李诗琪 汪朔 WANG Ping;XIA Dan;KONG De-bo;QIN Jie;JING Tai-le;YE Sun-yi;ZHU Yi;LI Shi-qi;WANG Shuo(Department of Urology,The First Affiliated Hospital,School of Medicine,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310003,Zhejiang,China)
出处 《第二军医大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第7期757-760,共4页 Academic Journal of Second Military Medical University
关键词 良性前列腺增生 机器人手术 腹腔镜技术 单纯前列腺切除术 benign prostatic hyperplasia robotic surgical procedures laparoscopy simple prostatectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献18

  • 1Mozes B, Cohen YC, 01mer L, et al. Factors affecting change in quality of life after prostatectomy for benign prostatic hypertrophy: the impact of surgical techniques [ J ]. J Urol, 1996, 155 : 191- 196. DOI: 10. 1016/S0022-5347(01)66591-1.
  • 2Baumert H, Ballaro A, Dugardin F, et al. Laparoscopic versus open simple prostatectomy : a comparative study [ J ]. J Urol, 2006, 175 : 1691-1694. DOI : 10. 1016/S0022-5347 ( 05 ) 00986- 9.
  • 3Sen'eta V, Morgia G, Fondacaro L, et al. Open prostatectomy for benign prostatic enlargement in southern Europe in the late 1990 :l a contemporary series of 1800 interventions [ J ]. Urology, 2002 , 60:623-627. DOI: 10. 1016/S0090-4295(02)01860-5.
  • 4Gratzke C, Schlenker B, Seitz M, et al. Complications and early postoperative outcome after open prostalectomy in patients with benign prostatic enlargement: results of a prospective multicenter study[J]. J Urol,2007,177 : 1419-1422. DOI : 10. 1016/j. juro. 2006.11. 062.
  • 5Rehman J, Khan SA, Sukkarich T, et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic prostatectomy (adenomectomy) for obstructing benign prostatic hyperplasia: transvesieal arxd transcapsular (Millin) techniques[J]. J Endourol, 2005,19:491-496. DOI : 10. 1089/ end. 2005.19. 491.
  • 6Mariano MB, Tefilli MV, Graziottin TM, et al. Laparoscopie prostatectomy with vascular control for benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. J Urol,2002,167:2528-2529. DOI: 10. 1016/S0022-5347 ( 05 ) 65025-2.
  • 7MeCullough TC, Heldv,'ein FL, Soon SJ, et al. Laparoseopie versus open simple prostatectomy: an evaluation of morbidity. J Endourol, 2009, 23:129-133. DOI: 10. 1089/end. 2008. 0401.
  • 8Sotelo R, Clavijo R, Carmona O, et al. Robotic simple prostatectomy[ J]. J Urol, 2008,179:513-515. DOI: 10. 1016/j. juro. 2007.09. 065.
  • 9Leslie S, Abreu AL, Chopra S, et al. Transvesical robotic simple prostatectomy: initial clinical experience [ J]. J Eur Urol, 2014, 66:321-329. DOI : 10. 1016/j. eururo. 2013.12. 020.
  • 10Hoy NY, Van Zyl S, St Martin BA. Initial Canadian experience with robotic simple prostatectomy: Case series and literature review [J]. Can Urol Assoc J,2015, 9: e626-e630. DOI: 10. 5489/ cuaj. 2750.

共引文献8

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部