王船山对朱熹经权关系理论的批评与发展

Wang Chuanshan’s Criticism on Zhu Xi’s Theory of the Relationship between Jing and Quan and His Development of the Theory

朱熹不满意程颐"权即是经"的提法,认为"经与权亦当有辨".王船山沿袭了程颐经权统一的立场,对朱熹刻意分辨"经""权"的做法持反对的意见.同时,对于朱熹"经疏而权密"的观点,以及他对汉儒"反经合道为权"观点的态度,王船山都进行了批评.王船山的经权观,将"经"和"权"之间的关系理解为一种体用关系,并突出了道德实践的主体性特征,这既是对前人经权理论的总结发展,又具有一定的启蒙意义.

Zhu Xi wasn’t satisfied with Cheng Yi’theory that Quan(权)is Jing(经),and believed that there should be a distinction between Quan and Jing.Wang Chuanshan followed Cheng Yi’s theoretical standpoint of unification of Jing and Quan,and opposed Zhu Xi’s idea of deliberately distinguishing Jing and Quan.At the same time,Chuanshan criticized Zhu Xi’s view that Jing is sparse but Quan is dense and his recognition of the Han Confucianism’s view that Quan is violating Jing and conformity with the standards of Tao.Wang Chuanshan regarded the relationship between Jing and Quan as the relationship between entity and application,and highlighted the subjectivity of moral practice.He not only summarized and developed his predecessors’theory of Jing and Quan,but also his theory had certain enlightening significance.