期刊文献+

车载地震紧急处置装置综合安全评价应用研究

Application of Comprehensive Safety Evaluation of the EETD
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了防止或减轻地震灾害对铁路运输安全带来的危害,提高铁路运输安全性,阐述车载地震紧急处置装置在高速铁路地震预警系统中的作用,结合车载地震紧急处置装置的特点,采用基于HAZOP分析和层次分析法的评价方法,对车载地震紧急处置装置进行综合安全评价。以在大西试验使用的车载地震紧急处置装置为例,采用车载地震紧急处置装置综合安全评价方法,对其进行综合安全评价,得出不同功能和偏差的权重及风险等级,验证该评价方法的适用性,为车载地震紧急处置装置的进一步改进和完善提供理论参考和依据。 As one of the essential components of the China high-speed Railway Earthquake early-warning System(CRES),the On-board Earthquake Emergency Treatment Device(EETD)plays an essential role in the safety of the earthquake early warning in high-speed railway.Therefore,it is essential to evaluate its safety.It is analyzed by the HAZOP method.The relevant information of the results of the HAZOP analysis is used to establish the mathematical model for quantitative analysis,and the univariate evaluation matrices are obtained based on the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method.The weight vectors are got by determining the weights of factors in the mathematical model based on the analytic hierarchy process.Furthermore,the results of the HAZOP could be quantitatively studied,and then the comprehensive safety evaluation of the EETD was realized.The results showed that to the EETD,the function u2 should be improved firstly,the risk level of the EETD was"Tolerable".The theoretical and reference basis for its further improvement could be provided.
作者 李京生 赵林 LI Jingsheng;ZHAO Lin(Postgraduate Department,China Academy of Railway Sciences,Beijing 100081,China;Railway Science and Technology Research&Development Center,China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited,Beijing 100081,China)
出处 《铁道运输与经济》 北大核心 2020年第7期73-78,共6页 Railway Transport and Economy
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(U1534202) 中国铁道科学研究院科研项目(2017YJ136,2018YJ156)。
关键词 高速铁路 车载地震紧急处置装置 综合安全评价 HAZOP分析 模糊综合评价法 层次分析法 High-Speed Railway On-board Earthquake Emergency Treatment Device Comprehensive Safety Evaluation HAZOP Analysis Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method Analytic Hierarchy Process
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献31

  • 1赵文芳,姜春明,姜巍巍,张卫华.HAZOP分析核心技术[J].安全、健康和环境,2005,5(3):1-3. 被引量:54
  • 2姜春明,赵文芳.HAZOP风险分析方法[J].安全、健康和环境,2006,6(6):35-38. 被引量:27
  • 3CIA 1993. A GUIDE TO HAZARD AND OPERABILITY STUDIES[ R], Chemical Industries Association,1993.
  • 4Schlechter. PROCESS RISK ASSESSMENT-USING SCIENCE TO "DO IT RIGHT" [ J]. W. Schlechter, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 1995, v61,n2-3,479 -494.
  • 5CCPS 1992, GUIDELINES FOR HAZARD EVALUATION PROCEDURES, SECOND EDITION [ R ]. Centre for Chemical Process Safety, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1992.
  • 6H. Ozag, L. M. Bendixen. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND QUANTIFICATION [ J ]. Chemical Engineering Progress, 1987, v83, n4,55 - 64.
  • 7W. E. Vesely, F. F. Goldberg, N. H, Roberts, D. F. Haasl. FAULT TREE HANDBOOK [ M ]. Washington : U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1981.
  • 8A. W. M. Balemans. CHECK-LIST. GUIDE LINES FOR SAFE DESIGN OF PROCESS PLANTS [ J ]. 1 st International Loss Prevention Symposium, 1974,7 -33.
  • 9J. L. Hawksley. RISK ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT [ 10 ]. The Safety Practitioner, 1987, v5,n10,10- 16.
  • 10Faisal I K, Abbasi S A. Risk analysis of a typical chemical industry using QRA qrocedure [ J ]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2001, (14) : 43 -59.

共引文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部