期刊文献+

炎症反应与中晚期食管癌患者放射治疗预后的相关性分析 被引量:11

Relationship between inflammatory response and radiotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨炎症反应[中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、格拉斯哥预后评分(GPS)]评估中晚期食管癌患者放射治疗预后的价值。方法选取2013年1月至2016年1月山西省肿瘤医院放射治疗胸部二病区收治的52例首次行放射治疗的老年食管癌患者,男34例,女18例,中位年龄72岁,年龄范围为60~83岁,对其临床资料进行回顾性分析。利用ROC曲线确定NLR、CRP、GPS的最佳界值,并分析放射治疗后NLR、CRP、GPS及其较放射治疗前降低情况(△NLR、△CRP、△GPS)与患者预后的关系。结果 NLR≤1.55患者的治疗效果优于NLR>1.55者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);而CRP、GPS的高低与患者近期治疗效果比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。所有患者的中位生存时间为19个月。高NLR患者中位生存时间(19个月)显著短于低NLR患者(39个月),高CRP患者中位生存时间(19个月)显著短于低CRP患者(38个月),高GPS患者的中位生存时间(16个月)显著短于低GPS患者(32个月),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。△NLR、△CRP、△GPS放射治疗后炎症指标升高者中位生存时间(38个月、33个月、31个月)长于放射治疗后炎症指标降低者(22个月、22个月、18个月),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。根据ROC曲线下面积,NLR对总生存时间的预测价值优于CRP、GPS,△NLR对总生存时间的预测价值优于△CRP、△GPS,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素分析结果显示,NLR、GPS均为独立预后危险因素,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论炎症指标NLR、CRP、GPS是中晚期食管癌患者放射治疗后的有效预测指标,其放射治疗前后的差值可辅助反应患者的预后情况。 Objective To evaluate the value of inflammatory response[neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio(NLR),C-reactive protein(CRP),Glasgow prognosis score(GPS)]in evaluating the prognosis of patients with advanced esophageal cancer after radiotherapy.Methods A retrospective study was performed on 52 cases of elderly patients with esophageal cancer who were admitted in The Second Department for Chest Radiotherapy of Shanxi Tumor Hospital from January 2013 to January 2016.The clinical data of 34 males and 18 females,with a median age of 72 years,ranged from 60 to 83 years old,were analyzed retrospectively.ROC curve was used to determine the optimal threshold values of NLR,CRP and GPS,and to analyze the relationship between NLR,CRP,GPS and prognosis after radiotherapy(△NLR,△CRP,△GPS).Results The therapeutic effect of patients with NLR≤1.55 was better than that with>1.55,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);while the level of CRP and GPS was not statistically significant compared with the patients′recent treatment effect(P>0.05).The median survival time for all patients was 19 months.The median survival time of the high NLR group(19 months)was significantly shorter than that of the low NLR group(39 months),and the median survival time of the high CRP group(19 months)was significantly shorter than that of the low CRP group(38 months).The median survival time of the group(16 months)was significantly shorter than that of the low GPS group(32 months),the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The median survival time(38 months,33 months,31 months)of patients with elevated inflammation indicators after radiotherapy was longer than those with reduced inflammation indicators(22 months,22 months,18 months),the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).According to the area under the ROC curve,the predictive value of NLR for total survival time is better than CRP and GPS,and the predictive value of△NLR for total survival time is better than△CRP and GPS,the difference is statistically significant(P<0.05).Multivariate analysis showed that NLR and GPS were independent prognostic risk factors,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Inflammation indexes NLR,CRP and GPS are effective predictive indexes for patients with advanced esophageal cancer after radiotherapy.The difference between before and after radiotherapy can help reflect the prognosis of patients.
作者 任雅琼 张宁刚 李琦 武亚娟 李晓敏 Ren Yaqiong;Zhang Ninggang;Li Qi;Wu Yajuan;Li Xiaomin(The Second Department for Chest Radiotherapy,Shanxi Tumor Hospital,Taiyuan 030013,China;The First Department for Gastroenterology,Shanxi Tumor Hospital,Taiyuan 030013,China)
出处 《中国临床实用医学》 2020年第3期7-12,共6页 China Clinical Practical Medicine
关键词 食管癌 中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值 C反应蛋白 格拉斯哥预后评分 ROC曲线 炎症反应 放射治疗 Esophageal cancer Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio C-reactive protein Glasgow prognostic score Receiver operating curve Inflammatory reaction Radiotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献8

  • 1Thompson WM,Halvorsen RA,Foster WL Jr,et al.Computed tomography for staging esophageal and gastroesophageal cancer:reevaluation.AJR Am J Roentgenol,1983,141:951-958.
  • 2Picus D,Balfe M,Koehler RE,et al.Computed tomagraphy in the staging of esophageal carcinoma.Radiology,1983,146:433-438.
  • 3刘泰福.现代放射肿瘤学.上海:上海医科大学出版社,2008.
  • 4Takashima S,Takeuchi N,Shiozaki H,et al.Carcinoma of the osophagus:CT vs MR imaging in determining resectability.AJR Am J Roentgenol,1991,156:297-302.
  • 5麻国新,万钧.早期食管癌的放射治疗//万钧,韩春,刘惠明.食管癌的放射治疗.2版.北京:原子能出版社,2006:161-166.
  • 6张焱,李荫太,高剑波,程敬亮,元成勋,武世平,曹晓军.术前CT“三角法”+“夹角法”判别食管癌外侵主动脉的探讨[J].临床放射学杂志,2000,19(10):658-659. 被引量:13
  • 7孙应实,张晓鹏,段红杨,黎庶,韩铭钧,何翠菊,李琳.食管癌对周围脏器浸润的CT与手术病理对照研究[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2000,11(6):393-396. 被引量:11
  • 8李彩英,刘明,彰俊杰,白世祥,孟宪利.CT食管癌改良T分期与病理对照研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2002,18(3):236-237. 被引量:35

共引文献259

同被引文献133

引证文献11

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部